The People of the state of New York Vs. Joseph Belstadt. Dependent appellant (2025)
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH H. BELSTADT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
808
Decided: November 21, 2025
PRESENT: MONTOUR, J.P., SMITH, GREENWOOD, NOWAK, AND KEANE, JJ.
THOMAS J. EOANNOU, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). His conviction stems from the disappearance of the 17-year-old victim in September 1993 in Niagara County.
According to witnesses and defendant’s statements to the police after the victim’s disappearance, the victim entered defendant’s car in the early hours of September 19, 1993. The victim’s mother filed a missing person report after she and the victim’s friends were unable to locate her. The victim was discovered deceased in a ravine around a month later, an article of clothing knotted around her neck. According to expert testimony at trial, the victim’s body and clothing reflected signs of a struggle, the cause of her death was asphyxiation by strangulation, and the manner of death was homicide.
In the days following the victim’s disappearance, the police began contacting numerous individuals who had seen her in the days before her death. Given that defendant was the last independently confirmed person to see the victim alive after she got into his car, defendant was determined to be a suspect early in the investigation. Among other things, hundreds of pieces of evidence – hairs, fibers, and other material – were collected from the victim’s body and from vacuuming defendant’s car and sent to the Niagara County Forensic Laboratory. Over the years that followed, evidence was examined and reexamined, analyzed in-house by Niagara County, and contracted out to the Erie County Central Police Services Forensic Science Laboratory as well as labs out of state, and a consultant reviewed evidence in the early to mid-2000s. In 2017, Mark Henderson, a Niagara County forensic analyst who had worked on the case since its inception, reexamined, among other things, a particular hair found in defendant’s car that, in 1997, had been deemed “dissimilar” to the victim’s hair by the Erie County lab that had analyzed it. According to Henderson, by using training and experience he had gathered since that time, he determined that the hair matched the victim’s known pubic hair. Another visually matching hair was then discovered among those collected from defendant’s car. Both pubic hairs were genetically matched to the victim through DNA analysis of the attached root tissue. In addition, around that time, fibers consistent with carpet fibers in defendant’s car were found among the victim’s clothing. Defendant was indicted in April 2018. After lengthy pretrial practice and a mistrial occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, defendant was tried in 2021 and convicted of murder in the second degree, the sole indicted count. Defendant appeals, and we affirm.
Defendant contends that the conviction is not based on legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant preserved for our review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence (see generally People v McGovern, 214 AD3d 1339, 1340 [4th Dept 2023], affd 42 NY3d 532 [2024]), we conclude, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of murder in the second degree (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Shortly after the victim’s disappearance, defendant himself admitted, and it was independently confirmed by other witnesses, that defendant had given the victim a ride in his car on September 19, 1993, at around 1:30 a.m. Although defendant claimed to have driven her a short distance to the stairs of a nearby church, that claim conflicted with the forensic evidence, namely the victim’s pubic hair found in different locations in defendant’s car. In addition, testimony at trial reflected defendant’s movements and behavior before and after he encountered the victim. After going to a nearby police station to complain about a recent traffic ticket at around 1:00 a.m., defendant declined an invitation to go to Canada with friends, instead opting to drive around because, according to those friends, he was upset over the tickets. While driving, defendant observed the victim and offered to give her a ride. According to his friends, when they returned from Canada, defendant’s car was not parked at his grandmother’s home, where defendant lived, or at his mother’s home. Another witness observed defendant alone in his car, which was wet, and defendant told the witness he had just washed it. In the days after, defendant appeared at various locations in an attempt at establishing a false alibi. He spoke to each of his four friends who had gone to Canada on the night that the victim disappeared, asking them to lie to the police and assert that defendant had gone with them, and defendant was absent from school during the week after the victim’s disappearance. Testimony also reflected that defendant had, in the summer of 1993, driven another young woman to a location near where the victim’s body would later be found. With respect to the element of intent, we note that the victim was found with clothing knotted around her neck, and that expert testimony at trial concluded that the state of her clothing and body reflected homicide by asphyxiation following a struggle. Further, the testimony of an individual who had been incarcerated with defendant on an unrelated charge reflected that defendant had admitted to strangling a girl in the early 1990s and leaving her body outdoors. We further conclude, after viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Monk, 57 AD3d 1497, 1499 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 785 [2009]; see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495).
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the opinion testimony of the expert pathologist, based upon, inter alia, his review of autopsy materials, was properly admitted at trial and did not violate defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation (see People v Ortega, 40 NY3d 463, 475-476 [2023]). “[T]he Confrontation Clause does not entirely preclude the use of information contained in testimonial autopsy reports,” and an expert may offer opinions related to the cause and manner of death if the expert has “used their independent analysis on the primary data,” including autopsy photographs, video recordings, and anatomical measurements (id. at 476-477; see People v Austin, 237 AD3d 736, 738 [2d Dept 2025]; People v Taveras, 228 AD3d 410, 412 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 1054 [2024]; People v Rivers, 225 AD3d 899, 901-902 [2d Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 929 [2024]). Here, the record reflects that the testifying expert, who did not perform or observe the autopsy, reached his conclusions based on an independent review of the proper materials rather than the conclusions of the performing medical examiner (see Austin, 237 AD3d at 738; cf. Ortega, 40 NY3d at 478).
We likewise reject defendant’s contention that his due process right to prompt prosecution was violated by the preindictment delay. In determining whether defendant was deprived of due process, we must consider the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), which are: “(1) the extent of the delay; (2) the reasons for the delay; (3) the nature of the underlying charge; (4) whether ․ there has been an extended period of pretrial incarceration; and (5) whether ․ there is any indication that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay” (id. at 445; see People v Johnson, 39 NY3d 92, 96 [2022]). These factors must be reviewed “in light of the particular factors attending to the specific case under scrutiny ․, there are no clear cut answers in such an inquiry, ․ [and] no one factor or combination of the factors ․ is necessarily decisive” (Taranovich, 37 NY2d at 445).
Although the delay in this case was substantial, the nature of the underlying charge was serious and defendant was not arrested on that charge until he was indicted (see People v Rogers, 103 AD3d 1150, 1151 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 946 [2013]). Moreover, although the delay in this case may have caused some degree of prejudice to defendant, the People satisfied their burden of demonstrating good cause for the delay (see id.; People v Chatt, 77 AD3d 1285, 1285 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 793 [2011]). Of note, the People submitted a sworn affidavit from Henderson, which presented a narrative of the investigative events since 1993, discussed the thousands of hours dedicated to the case, addressed the outside labs and consultants used to assist in bringing the investigation to a resolution, and explained the limitations of analyzing hundreds of car sweepings (see generally People v Johnson, 211 AD3d 1633, 1634 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 1111 [2023]). Contrary to defendant’s related contention, there was no need for a Singer hearing (see People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 255 [1978]) inasmuch as the record provided the court with “a sufficient basis to determine whether the delay was justified” (People v Ballowe, 173 AD3d 1666, 1668 [4th Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Rogers, 103 AD3d at 1151; People v Gathers, 65 AD3d 704, 704 [2d Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 859 [2009]).
Entered: November 21, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Non-Bundy Related.
Suspected or Convicted Serial Killers in Washington State.
Arthur Lee Allen, Investigative Documents.
BTK, The Transcript of his Guilty Plea.
BTK, State of Kansas Summary of Evidence.
The Zodiac Murders.
This is an excellent summarization of the Zodiac case.
Gary Leon Ridgway, Confirmed Victims: A List.
Jane Doe B-10: an unknown white female between twelve and nineteen that was discovered in 1984 close to the body of Cheryl Wims; she most likely was killed in the summer of 1983 and it’s suspected she had brown hair, stood around 5’5″ tall, and weighed 120 pounds. She was most likely left-handed and at one point in her adolescence had an injury to the front, left side of her head.
Jane Doe B-17: this victim most likely died in 1983 and their victims bones were found twice: some were found in 1984 and others were found in 1986. She was most likely a white female, aged 14-19, around 5’4”- 5’8” and average weight, around 120-140 lbs. Ridgway said she died in Spring or Summer 1983. Isotope testing shows she is possibly from the Northern United states (Alaska, Montana, Idaho, North Dakota) or Canada.
Jane Doe B- 20: discovered in 2003 after Ridgway led investigators to her remains, however her skull was never recovered so no composite sketch could be created (her race could also never be determined); it is known that she died some time in between 1973-1993 (but it most likely occurred sometime in the late 1970’s) and was most likely around thirteen to twenty-four years old. Ridgway confessed that he killed her sometime in the summer of either ’82 or ’83 and she was white and around twenty-years-old and had with brown or blonde shoulder length hair; he claimed to have started his crime spree in ’82 but it could have been earlier and doesn’t remember killing anyone in the 1970’s, but admitted it was possible.
Tualatin, Oregon and she was last seen alive somewhere in Seattle on June 9, 1983. In the days that followed her disappearance, Tammie wasn’t immediately reported missing, most likely because she had ran away in the past, and it wasn’t believed that she had been met with foul play. Liles skull and partial remains were discovered near a golf course in Tualatin, Oregon on April 23, 1985 during a subsequent search of the area after the remains of Angela Girdner were recovered nearby the day before. Tammie remained unidentified until early 1988, when her parents finally reported their daughter as missing; and upon obtaining her dental records, detectives were able to make an identification of her remains later that March. After Ridgway was captured in 2003, he unknowingly led King County Detectives to Tammie’s remains as the scene that he took them to contained somewhere between twenty-five to thirty bones (some of which belonged to her). Sadly, Angela Girdner remained unidentified until 2009, when a positive match was made using dental records. When Ridgway was asked about Tammie and Angela’s he denied killing them both, and he was convicted of Tammie’s murder but not of Angela’s. After the rest of Lile’s remains were discovered in 2003, they were sent to Othram Labs in January 2024 and came back a match; she was Ridgway’s last victim to be unidentified after Lori Razpotnik in December 2023.
Linda Benson, Documents from the Grand Junction PD.
Grand Junction Police Department records related to the July 25, 1975 murder of Linda Benson and her five-year-old daughter, Kelly Ketchum. Their murders were only a small part of a much larger and ongoing crime spree in Grand Junction, CO that seemed to target individuals that knew too much about the region’s narcotics activities linked to corrupt law enforcement such as former police chief Ben Meyers. It was said that one of Linda’s neighbors reported to seeing a man that matched Ted Bundy’s description around the complex right before the murder took place.
Henry Lee Lucas, documents from Bob Prince.
Wendy Lee Coffield.*
Background: Wendy Lee Coffield was born on April 17, 1966 to Herbert and Virginia (nee Eaton) Coffield in Renton, WA. Herbert ‘Bert’ Ralph Coffield was born on April 1, 1937 in Bellingham, WA and Virginia Lee Eaton was born on September 6, 1945 in Kellogg, Idaho (although one source said the event took place in Portland, OR). Upon returning home from the Korean War (he was drafted in Fairbanks, Alaska on April 5, 1955) Bert married Virginia Eaton on February 26, 1965 and the couple had two children together: Wendy and her older sister Patricia ‘Patsy’ Lee, who was born on February 27, 1965. According to Patsy, Wendy had been causing difficulties ‘starting from the minute she was born,’ and she ‘had a way of running into trouble,’ but Virginia was a bit less critical, and said where she her younger daughter was definitely a ‘spitfire’ she ‘wasn’t a troublemaker,’ and was more ‘mischievous. I don’t think she was what you’d call real trouble.’
When Wendy was thirteen her parents divorced on October 17, 1979, and after the split she stayed with her mother, who said that her daughter was: ‘wild in a lot of ways, but I don’t think it was a harmful kind of wild. The only one it hurt was herself.’ Mrs. Coffield said her behavioral problems intensified after the two had left the family farm in Black Diamond and moved about a half-hour away into low-income housing in Kent, WA.
Adolescence: Virginia said that when Wendy was still in her care she would frequently disappear for days at a time, and when she eventually returned would never tell her where she had been; she clarified that she didn’t consider her to be a runaway because she ‘always came back.’ Despite officially being listed as a prostitute, Mrs. Coffield said she strongly felt that her daughter was more likely to have tried to con money from the men, and wouldn’t have had sex with them.
Wendy’s mother said her daughter had been ‘a good little girl’ when they were living in the country, but her ‘trouble’ began when they moved to Kent then Auburn (which are both relatively small when compared to nearby Seattle or Tacoma). The Coffield’s never had much money and Virginia seemed to especially struggle after her divorce; mother and daughter quickly jumped around from one low-rent residence to another, and there was even a brief period in the warmer spring and summer months when they were forced to live in a tent, eating blackberries from nearby bushes that they also sold to buy food.
One night, when Wendy was fourteen or fifteen Virginia recalled that she had come home disheveled and upset: ‘she said some guy raped her while she was hitchhiking. That’s the way she got around. Hitchhiking. I told her that’s what happens. After that, she changed.’ Mrs. Coffield acknowledged that her daughter had ‘one brush with hard drugs,’ and had been involved in other minor infractions like ‘drinking in school and trying to sell a health food supplement as a drug.’ At the time Wendy disappeared her mother had only been thirty-six and had barely made it through her own painful childhood: her parents had been far more worried about getting drunk and her needs sadly fell to the wayside, as Vigrinia had come from ‘a big family of drinkers.’
At sixteen Virginia had become pregnant and had given that baby up for adoption, and from there, she spent two years at Maple Lane, a juvenile corrections facility for young ladies located in Grand Mound,WA: ‘I felt like I was a misfit; nobody understood me. She (Wendy) was seeking help just like I did, but they put her out (of juvenile detention) when they should have given her supervision. She just needed a couple of years off the street to grow up.’ Mrs. Coffield said her problems with drinking, coping with divorce, and a boyfriend much like her junior that Wendy was also interested in romantically only contributed to her problems.
1982: By the middle of 1982, Virginia and Wendy were living in yet another run-down apartment in downtown Puyallup, and after she stopped going to junior high she enrolled in Kent Continuation School in a half-assed attempt to keep up with her education (she reportedly preferred to spend her time partying and drinking). She was known to use drugs on a frequent basis and occasionally engaged in sex work, and by sixteen she had already been arrested multiple times. At the time of her murder in July 1982 she was romantically involved with a twenty-one-year-old, and instead of making her daughter end it Virginia began to date him, and even moved him into their apartment; he turned out to be physically abusive to both of them, and mother and daughter would often fight over him. Shortly before Wendy was murdered her mother had finally admitted to herself that she had lost control of her, and that she ‘just started having trouble’ and had been well-known to LE in both King and Pierce Counties: ‘the last thing she did was she took $140 in food stamps from one of our neighbors.’
Mrs. Coffield said that in the earlier part of 1982 Wendy had been sent to Reman Hall in University Place after she stole lunch tickets from Sumner Junior High School, and had returned home that May. Upon their reunion Virginia said her daughter apologized for what she did and told her that she loved her, but her good behavior didn’t last long and the authorities had to be called after she stole food stamps from a neighbor and used them to fill her mother’s cupboards (which she discovered one night after returning home from bingo). After the incident the two ‘decided together’ that the best place for Wendy was in an ‘alternative placement,’ and after they signed the papers they cried together; Virginia also said that at one point her daughter told her that: ‘she hated me and never wanted to see me again. But I knew inside she didn’t mean it. She was hurt. She was trying to help me, she thought.’
July 8, 1982: There seems to be some uncertainty when it comes to the final hours of Wendy Lee Coffield’s life: according to her Virginia, she was allowed to leave the foster home that she had been living in at the time, but there was a court-imposed curfew. She reportedly visited with her for the last time on July 8, 1982, and from there one source claimed that she told her mother of plans of spending the night at her grandfather’s house later that same day, and that her foster mother had given her permission, but it was later discovered she was only supposed to ‘go for a walk.’ It was the last time she was seen alive.
In the months that followed her daughter’s murder Virginia said she wished she had spent more time getting to know her and that she had developed a better understanding of her; she said that where Wendy wasn’t an ‘angel by any means’ she was still lonely without her: ‘I just wish that it was over, that it was solved and he (Wendy’s killer) was locked up somewhere. I just wish she was here and we didn’t have to go through this.’
According to a psychologist’s report that was conducted by the Seattle Youth Department after one of her arrests, Wendy generally: ‘did not look at me and was consistently sullen throughout the examination. At times she expressed herself angrily. She generally appeared reluctant to extend herself mentally and tended to give up over-easily. She evidenced a general dysmorphia and pessimism about herself and her situation. She was an angry, resistant, immature young woman who seems deeply unhappy with herself and with her external world. All in all, I believe Wendy is certainly not capable of managing her own life constructively and in socially appropriate directions.’
The Discovery: Seven days after Coffield was last seen alive on July 15th, 1982, Gallan Hirschi and his friend Robert were riding their bikes in Kent when they noticed remains of a woman snagged on pilings against an old river post underneath the southern side of the Peck Bridge located on Meeker Street in Kent, WA. In the summer months of 1982, the water in the Green River wasn’t very deep, and as a result she would have been in plain sight of anyone that crossed the bridge. Close to where Wendy’s body was found, there was a restaurant called ‘The Ebb Tide,’ and only a block away was a topless bar, a meat-packing plant, a two-story motel, as well as a handful of fast-food eateries.
Because of the low water level in the Green River in the summer of 1982, much of its rocky shoreline and reedy grasses was exposed, so it wouldn’t have been very difficult for someone to carry Wendy from their car down to the river (although it obvious would have to been in the cloak of darkness at night). At first glance, the two fifteen-year-olds thought the object in the water looked like a large bag or possibly even a mannequin, but after they got off their bikes and went closer to get a better look they realized they were looking at human hair and a jacket. According to Hirschi, ‘the thing that caught my eye was tennis shoes. That doesn’t go away.’ The incident was followed by years of nightmares and an intense fear of walking close to water, and to this day he doesn’t like the sight of hair under water.
King County Medical Examiner Dr. Don Reay noted that the young victim had five tattoos: a vine around a heart on her left arm, two tiny butterflies above her breasts, a cross with a vine around it on her shoulder, a Harley Davidson motorcycle insignia on her back, and the unfinished outline of a unicorn on her lower abdomen. In the days that immediately followed the discovery, the King County ME was able to determine that she hadn’t drowned and had already been dead when she was left in the Green River. After a description of the young woman’s body art was published in the local Seattle newspapers, a tattoo artist recognized his work and came forward and identified the victim as Wendy. According to reports, he said, ‘I think she lives in Puyallup with her mother. She’s only sixteen.’
Detectives eventually located Virginia, and although she appeared to be in shock, she murmured to herself, ‘I kind of expected it.’ She then explained that she wondered if Wendy had been working as a prostitute and that she may have been attacked and killed by a ‘John.’ I know that was the kind of life she chose for herself. We taught her the best we could.’
The medical examiner’s office determined that Wendy had been strangled to death with her own pants in a different location then had been brought to Peck Bridge to be discarded, where she had remained for several days before she had been found; according to Ann Rule’s book, ‘Green River, Running Red,’ Coffield had been ‘partially naked’ when she had been recovered and had been ‘violently choked with her own panties.’ Because she was reported missing on July 8th, 1982, it is possible that she had been dead for up to a week and by the time she had been recovered her remains were badly decomposed because of the summer temperatures.
Virginia Coffield says she remembered her younger daughter as a ‘cute, little blue-eyed blonde, full of life,’ … ‘It’s sick. When you see your baby there all discolored and not all there.’ In an interview with The News Tribune reporter Teresa Cronin, Virginia Coffield said that she wished that she didn’t turn Wendy over to authorities the second time that she got in trouble, and had she known what was going to happen she would have kept her at home and disciplined her there.
Lawsuit: In February of 1983 Herbert and Virginia Coffield filed a lawsuit in Pierce County Superior Court alleging that the state of Washington along with the supervisors at the foster home that their daughter was residing at were negligent in her care and supervision. The family’s attorney Roger Wilson stated that Wendy should have been in a ‘more secure’ facility and that the state did not properly inform the home of her history, for example her previous threats to run away from Remann Hall; both the state and the foster parents denied responsibility for the child’s murder.
The suit was dismissed in April 1986 after a judge ruled in favor of ‘Jeannie Powers and her husband’ (who were the operators of the foster home) because ‘state juvenile law prevented them from holding the girl against her will’ and ‘the state and foster home had no duty to police the minor under their jurisdiction.’
Gary Leon Ridgway: When King County LE pulled the body of Wendy Lee Coffield out of the Green River,they had no idea it was the beginning of a nightmare that would go on for well over ten years, and before 1982 was over, a truck painter and husband/father of one named Gary Leon Ridgway would go on to murder fifteen women. Only nine days after Wendy Coffield was last seen alive, seventeen-year-old Gisele Ann Lovvorn disappeared on July 17, 1982; her remains were uncovered a little over two months later on September 25, 1982. The first time that Ridgway came up on police radar was on April 30, 1983 after his victim Marie Malvar disappeared: her boyfriend followed a pick-up truck that was connected to her disappearance that was later proven to belong to him.
Gary Leon Ridgway was eventually charged with killing Wendy Lee Coffield in April 2003, and it was eventually determined that he was responsible for the murders of at least forty-nine women across Seattle between 1982 and 1984. In March 2003 a private laboratory called ‘Microtrace’ discovered tiny spheres of spray paint on the clothes of Wendy Coffield and Debra Estes, which was structurally identical to the highly unique DuPont Imron paint that was used at the Kenworth Truck Plant outside of Seattle where Ridgway worked as a truck painter.
Conclusion: Herbert Coffield died at the age of sixty-eight on October 10, 2005 in Bellingham, WA. According to his obituary, over the course of his life Bert had worked many jobs across multiple states, including Alaska, Oregon, and Washington, and at one point even owned his own business called ‘Bert’s Janitorial Services’ in Fairbanks. In addition to blue collar work, he also owned a company called ‘The Tohunga Co.’ in Kent, which made contemporary and primitive art pieces.
In his younger years Bert collected firearms and owned multiple motorcycles, and in 1954 he rode his Harley from Fairbanks to Bellingham using the Alcan Highway (which is unofficially referred to as ‘The Alaskan Highway’) when it was still very new and primitive. A nature lover and artist, Mr. Coffield was always doing and creating something, whether it was carving wood, oil painting, or drawing; he also loved to read and was always in the middle of a book in an attempt to ‘discover the answers to life’s deeper mysteries.’ He had a ‘consummately generous spirit’ and was always ‘giving things away’ in an attempt to share the recent things that he had recently learned and picked up. He didn’t believe in death at the end, but ‘as a transfer point to the next level of consciousness.’
In her final few years on this earth Virginia lived with Patsy and died after what seems like a life full of struggles and mental illness on June 19, 2018 at the age of seventy-three. I was easily able to find Patsy’s Facebook page, and in her (public) posts she made no secret that her mother had suffered from self-harm tendencies and often resorted to verbal threats and physical abuse when she didn’t get her way.
Wendy’s sister Patsy Lee was only fifty-eight when she passed away in her sleep in her home in Enumclaw on January 28, 2024. In her adult life, she worked at Circle K and Seven Eleven for several years before she later found employment at the Muckleshoot Casino Resort in Auburn, retiring around 2022. According to her obituary, Patsy adored her late parents and sister and missed them all greatly, and she enjoyed sharing her memories about them.
* I do feel that it is important to note that Wendy Lee Coffield is not technically Gary Ridgway’s first victim: at the age of sixteen he stabbed a six-year-old boy, critically injuring him; LE ignored the child when he blamed him for the attack and he went unpunished. In 1980, Ridgway was arrested for allegedly choking a prostitute, but no charges were filed after he claimed that the woman had bit him. Two years later he was arrested for solicitation, and it’s strongly speculated that he began murdering women shortly after.
Another Bundy Blog. 