‘Legal Ethics: Confidentiality and the Case of Robert Garrow’s Lawyers,’ Written by Jeffrey Frank Chamberlain of the Buffalo Law Review and published on October 1, 1975.
Introduction: Cornelia* June Enright was born on December 19, 1950 to Raymond and Alice Enright in Schenectady, NY. Raymond Basil Enright was born on February 20, 1915 in Schenectady, NY, and Alice Shaw was born on June 30, 1918 (also in Schenectady). The couple were married on May 16, 1936 and went on to have three children together: John (b. 1937), Robert (b. 1943), and Cornelia. Mr. Enright was drafted into WWII on April 17, 1943 (he enlisted on October 16, 1940), and in the early part of his marriage was employed at Gloversville Knitting Company. *I did see Connie’s name listed s ‘Constance’ in one source, but that is incorrect.
During her time at Linton High School in Schenectady, Connie majored in Business Education and during her sophomore year was an alternate for the student council, and during her senior year she was an intern for the guidance counselor’s office. A former classmate described her as ‘a ball of energy’ that always made a point of going out of her way to say hello, despite them only being casual acquaintances and having no classes together. Enright graduated in 1968, and a few weeks before she disappeared in April 1969 got a full-time job at the Almart’s Discount Store, which (at the time) was located on Central Avenue in Colonie. At the time she disappeared Connie was nineteen, and she wore her strawberry blonde hair short, had blue eyes, stood at 5’2″ tall and weighed 115 pounds.
April 24, 1969: Raymond and Alice last heard from Cornelia around 9:30 PM on April 24, 1969, when she left with the family car to meet up ‘a girlfriend with whom she worked with’ in nearby Rotterdam for a bite to eat. She arrived at Lum’s Restaurant at 9:30 and according to her friend, the two ate and chatted then eventually went their separate ways in the parking lot; she was last seen driving away from the establishment at 11:00 PM.
The Day After: upon realizing their daughter never returned home the prior evening, the next morning at around 8 AM Cornelia’s father called the Schenectady Police Department and filed a police report. Later that same day the Enright family vehicle was found on State Street near Friendly’s Ice Cream Shop; it was locked, and the keys were missing. Her purse was also nowhere to be found. In the days following Connie’s disappearance, her parents searched her bedroom, top to bottom, but found nothing to be missing. It’s also worth mentioning that the day she disappeared was ‘the day before payday,’ and that she only had around ten to fifteen dollars on her.
Connie’s parents felt their daughter didn’t leave ‘of her own choice,’ and her disappearance was the ‘result of foul play.‘ After very little movement on her case, in 1980 Mr. and Mrs. Enright filed paperwork to have Connie declared ‘legally dead,‘ and said in their petition that in the eleven years since she disappeared, they have unsuccessfully continued searching for her; it went on to say that their efforts included a trip to Newport, Rhode Island after they received a tip that a young woman matching her description was seen at a local store. Unfortunately, the trip was uneventful, but they left some pictures of her behind at the market (just in case). Cornelia’s parents also said she ‘had never run away before’ and that prior to her disappearing they: ‘had no fights or disagreements. To the best of our knowledge, she had no secret boyfriends and none of her friends turned up missing.’
The Enright’s said that from the ‘knowledge of our daughter,’ based on the ‘circumstances surrounding’ her disappearance, that ‘it is our opinion that our daughter is now deceased.’ The petition, which had been prepared by the couples’ attorney Cristine Ciofi of the Schenectady law firm of Higgins, Roberts, Beyerl & Coan, PC Law Firm Profile requested that Connie be declared dead and that her estate (which consisted of personal property with a value not exceeding $400) be settled.
Ray and Alice said Connie was a ‘considerate and thoughtful daughter. If she knew she would be out later than 11 PM she would called home and appraised us of the fact.’ They also said their efforts to find her also included a letter to the Social Security Administration in Baltimore as well as multiple conversations with her co-workers, friends, and acquaintances. They also added ‘we further believe that were she alive today, she would have sent us knowledge of the fact.’ The petition to have Connie declared legally deceased was based on a law which provides that a person who is absent for ‘a continuous period of five years who has not been seen or heard from after diligent search and whose absence is not satisfactory explained, shall he presumed have died ‘five years after such unexplained absence commenced.’ Their request was approved and Raymond Enright was declared the executive of his daughter’s estate.
Ted Bundy?: at the end of 1968, Ted left Seattle behind and enrolled at Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, and it was also around this time that he was dumped by his first love, Diane Edwards; reports pointed towards him being in a ‘defeated state of mind,’ and that he was lonely and detached. In early 1969, he briefly relocated to the East Coast and slip-flopped between staying at his grandparents’ house in Roxborough and his aunt’s apartment in Lafayette Hill. He was mostly active in his studies at Temple until early March, when (typical Ted)… he stopped going to class after he got into a minor car accident and hurt his ankle.
After Ted found out about being illegitimate, he used some of his ‘leftover money’ (whatever that is) from when he sold his first VW bug in 1968 and went on a trip to New-York City (supposedly he a friend from school had lent him a car). While there he spent his time exploring ‘flesh-shops and accessing the most explicit forms of pornography’ before he returned to Philadelphia (then eventually Washington).
Also around this time Bundy frequented Ocean City, New Jersey, where his grandparents owned a home on 26th Street (he spent a good amount of time there as a child). Where he isn’t officially linked to the murders, he is heavily suspected of being responsible for the murders of Susan Davis and Elizabeth Perry, two coeds from Monticello Women’s Junior College in Godfrey, Illinois that were were brutally stabbed to death on Memorial Day weekend in 1969. Ted would hint in later interviews that he committed his first abduction and murder in Ocean City, in the ‘early summer or spring’ of 1969.
It is worth mentioning that Connie’s car keys were never located, meaning they (most likely) were at some time in the possession of her abductor; Ted’s future girlfriend Liz Kloepfer stated after his first arrest she went snooping around his room at the Rogers Boarding House and she found a bowl full of miscellaneous keys that didn’t belong to him. Cornelia also disappeared at night in a parking lot, which are similar circumstances to many of Bundy’s confirmed victims (Carol DaRonch, Georgann Hawkins, Brenda Ball, Caryn Campbell, Denise Naslund, etc…). Schenectady is also only a few hours away from both Philadelphia and NYC, which puts him fairly near to Connie at the time she disappeared, and we all know Ted had no problem driving hundreds of miles at a time to hunt for his perfect victim. Additionally, we all know that he targeted girls that fit Enright’s physical description, age, personality and socioeconomic background.
Lemuel Warren Smith: one plausible suspect for the abduction of Cornelia Enright is Lemuel Warren Smith, a convicted rapist and serial killer that operated around the general Albany area that is perhaps best known for being the first person in US history to kill an on duty female corrections officer. While serving out his life sentences at the Green Haven Correctional Facility, Smith murdered thirty-one-year-old Donna Payant; her body was found in a landfill after it was discarded in the prison’s trash.
In April 1969, Smith was a free man living in the Capital District of New York following a 1959 conviction for kidnapping and attempted murder in Baltimore, where he served nearly ten years of a twenty-year sentence before he was paroled in May 1968. He largely stayed in the Albany area during this time until he was rearrested on May 20, 1969 when he kidnapped and sexually assaulted two women in a single day. This time Smith was sentenced to four to fifteen years but was paroled again in October 1976 (shortly before he began the murder spree for which he is best known for). He was caught for the final time on August 19, 1977 after he kidnapped and raped eighteen-year-old Marianne Maggio; thankfully when he forced her to drive towards Albany afterwards, LE stopped their vehicle and took Smith into custody (without incident). As of 2024, Smith remains incarcerated at the Wende Correctional Facility in New York, and where he confessed to his earlier murders, he has consistently maintained his innocence regarding the death of Donna Payant, claiming he was framed by other prison guards’ (a theory that Payant’s own son has called to be reinvestigated).
Robert Garrow: one individual from a Schenectady Facebook group (where I posted asking if anyone remembered Connie) suggested that I look into Robert Garrow, but when I did I got the impression he was more of a pervert and (eventually) spree-killer so I don’t think he would have anything to do with Enright’s disappearance (more importently, he was only active in 1973). In April 1969, Garrow was a free man living in the general Syracuse area and had been released from prison for ‘good behavior’ the previous year after serving only six years of a twenty-year sentence for a 1961 rape conviction. Information regarding his day-to-day activities between 1968 and 1973 is sparse, although it has been confirmed that he worked as a mechanic for a bakery in Syracuse around this time. Investigators have suspected him of being responsible for several cold cases during his five years of freedom, including the 1959 murder of Ruth Whitman, who lived close to him at the time she was killed.
Arthur Shawcross: a name that came up only once in my research is serial killer Arthur John Shawcross, who oddly enough had two separate ‘rounds’ of murders as well as two different types of victims: in 1972 he went away for killing two children under the age of ten in Watertown, NY, and after serving only a fraction of his sentence he was released early on ‘good behavior,’ where he went onto kill eleven sex workers in Rochester. In April 1969, Shawcross was involved in some ‘lower-level’ criminal activity (IE not murder), specifically an arson attack at the Knowlton Brothers Paper Mill. Following this and other incidents involving burglary and arson, he was sentenced to a five-year prison term, of which he served only twenty-two months and he was paroled in October 1971; additionally, some records indicate he was honorably discharged from the US Army around April 1969. I could find no link between him and Cornelia Enright (personally, I don’t think she fit into wither of his demographic of victims).
Frosty Austin: right as I was about to hit the ‘publish’ button, I came across one final piece of information regarding the disappearance of Connie Enright… and at the risk of being dramatic, its something that I find incredibly eerie (I actually sat up in bed and said, ‘oh my gosh, oh my gosh’ a bunch of times until my husband finally asked ‘what?’). There was a unhoused woman in Modesto, CA that (even in her ‘advanced age’) looked incredibly similar to a young Connie, and where I’m not normally someone that puts much effort into ‘solving’ missing persons cases (I will never pretend I know more than law enforcement), this made me actually stop and pay attention.
‘Frosty Austin’ is the alias of an unidentified woman that passed away in a Modesto, California nursing home on October 6, 2018, and despite exhaustive efforts by detectives and the FBI, her true identity remains a mystery. Ms. Austin lived in the Stockton, California area for over thirty years and claimed her maiden name was O’Malley. At the time of her death, she was estimated to be around sixty-seven-years old, 5’6″ tall (Connie waas only 5’2”), and approximately 214 pounds; she had strawberry blonde hair and blue eyes.
Authorities and those that were aquainted with her believe Austin may have been a ‘con-woman’ or fraudster that used multiple assumed identities and told conflicting stories about her past. Her case is listed in the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System as case #UP58456, and ‘armchair detectives’ on social media platforms like Websleuths and Reddit have attempted to link her to multiple missing womens cases (although no match has ever been confirmed).
Conclusion: Connie’s father Raymond Basil Enright passed away at the age of eighty-two on November 5, 1997, and at the time of his death he had been married to Alice for sixty-one years. According to his obituary, he was born and educated in Schenectady and was employed with General Electric for thirty-seven years: he started his career as an electrician in the main plant and by the time he retired had worked his way up to being a ‘mechanic analyst’ at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory. Mr. Enright was also a member of the GE Quarter Century Club and was part of the flock at the Faith Baptist Church in Schenectady.
Alice June Enright was ninety-four when she entered into eternal rest on January 31, 2013 in Schenectady, NY. According to her obituary, Mrs. Enright was a member of the Faith Baptist Church in Rexford and was a volunteer with their food pantry for many years. She loved seeing movies at the local theater, going out to eat with her loved ones, and gardening; she was also a great cook and enjoyed hosting holidays at her home with her family and friends. Alice looked forward to traveling and visiting with her son Robert that lived in Florida.
Connie’s brother Robert died at the age of eighty-seven on July 26, 2023 in Niceville, FL. Per his obituary, he graduated from Mount Pleasant High School in 1961 and entered the Air Force shortly after in August 1961, where he served his country for twenty-eight-years as a Weapons Mechanic; he was also involved in the Chemical Warfare unit with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Robert retired as a Senior Master Sergeant and was stationed in several location to include Plattsburgh, NY, Japan, North Carolina, Korea, Thailand (twice) Louisiana, England, Arizona, Virginia, and Florida. He took several classes at Okaloosa-Walton Junior College (which is now Northwest Florida State College) and briefly attended the Senior Non-Commissioned Officer Academy; after he retired from the military, he worked maintenance at the Rocky Bayou Baptist Church for seventeen years, where he also served as a Deacon and was involved in multiple organizations (including Faithful Men, Men’s Retreat Committee, Men’s Breakfast, Benevolence, and Choir). He also loved bowling, running, fishing in his kayak with his buddies, camping, gospel music, and Jesus. John B. Enright died at the age of eighty-six on June 14, 2024 in Schenectady, New York.
As of April 2026, no trace of Cornelia Enright has never been recovered, and in the years following her disappearance, every member of her immediate family has passed away. It could be that for whatever reason, she just decided to up and leave her existing life behind for a new one… but we’ll probably never know the full story.
Works Cited:
charleyproject.org/case/cornelia-june-enright
DeCamilla, Jane. (April 24, 2025). ’56 Years Later, Still No Answers in Disappearance of Schenectady Woman.’ Taken April 20, 2026 from cbs6albany.com
reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/v8qprv/link_between_ted_bundy_cornelia_j_enright_and/
Sommers, Ashleigh. (October 10, 2025). Taken April 20, 2026 from /ashmysteries.com
troopers.ny.gov/missing-enright-cornelia-june Taken on April 20, 2026.
websleuths.com/threads/ny-cornelia-connie-enright-18-rotterdam-24-april-1969.340318/












































Introduction: My husband and I enjoy vacationing in the Adirondack Mountains for a variety of reasons, but mostly because we used to go there as kids, and it was the first getaway we ever went on together back in December 2015. For Christmas last year my SIL gifted him the mascot for the 1980 Lake Placid Olympic Games, a stuffed raccoon named ‘Roni.’ I do have plans (one day) of writing about serial killer Robert Garrow, who was a rapist, spree killer, and (suspected) serial murderer that was active in the Adirondack area in the early 1970’s (but that time is not now). After committing several rapes, he went on an eighteen-day long killing spree (from July 11–29, 1973) across the Mountains, and stabbed four people to death before he was apprehended. His criminal trial (dubbed ‘the Buried Bodies Case’) became vital in the area of legal ethics after his lawyers refused to disclose the location of the remains of two of his victims, citing ‘attorney–client privilege.’ Garrow was later shot while attempting to escape from prison on September 11, 1978 and died at the age of forty-two.
Back to Roni: Roni the Raccoon is the mascot of the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid that was dreamt up by Don Moss, a renowned sports artist and illustrator that worked for ‘Capital Sports.’ Roni is a raccoon, which is an indigenous woodland critter from the mountainous region of the Adirondacks where Lake Placid is located. The name ‘Roni’s comes from the word ‘racoon’ in Iroquoian, which is the language of the native people from the region of NYS, and was chosen by the children of the Lake Placid school system.
The top part of Roni’s face along with the black-and-white mask around his eyes are a nod to the sunglasses and hat worn by Olympic competitors, and there are different versions of him playing different sports (some even have the five colors of the Olympic rings); he is also the first Olympic mascot to be depicted doing various sports, and was featured on pins and other souvenirs. In the early stages of planning the event Lake Placid had a live four-legged mascot: a raccoon named Rocky, who was (controversially) switched out with Roni shortly before the Games started. The Organizing Committee also used real raccoons to promote The Games, and two residents of Utica Zoo were transported to Lake Placid to participate in a national TV broadcast.
A Life-Sized Roni: serving as the face of the XIII Olympic Winter Games was Hawaiian-American athlete named Kriss Lambert, who performed as Roni Raccoon clad head-to-toe in a six-and-a half-foot tall raccoon costume. Lambert was filmed doing every event (except the ski jump, which he couldn’t do because the mask hindered his vision) before The Games took place, and the prerecorded footage was televised during the Olympics to introduce each event. He also represented the 1980 Lake Placid Olympics at major events like the Macy’s Day Parade, NBC’s ‘Today’ show, and Super Bowl XIV, and he was rink side during the ‘Miracle on Ice’ men’s ice hockey game between USSR and the USA; the USA won 4-3.
Lambert himself dreamt up the idea of portraying a real-life Roni even though there had never been a ‘live’ Olympic mascot before, and he was doing construction work in the Adirondacks before he decided to become a FT Olympic mascot: ‘since I am somewhat of an athlete, I thought it would be a good idea to have a character that could imitate the athletes.’ It’s worth noting that at the age of thirteen in 1973, he won the Junior Olympic gold medal in judo, and he practiced acrobatic skiing for nearly six years (he also ice skated since he was a child). Tragically, Kriss died suddenly on August 30, 2017 at the age of fifty-seven in Puyallup, WA.
Works Cited:
Hale, Don. (February 25, 1980). Roni Raccoon Wins ‘Gold Medal’ in Fun.’ Taken March 23, 2025 from csmonitor.com

























































































Over the weekend my husband and I had to put our sweet little puppy dog to sleep. In the Spring of 2013 I was volunteering at my local SPCA and there was this little Jack Russell Terrier that kept getting brought back because he wasn’t a typical ‘family dog’ (I won’t lie, he was a grade-A asshole most of the time), so I said I’d bring him home for a (single) weekend that May and I had him ever since. He has been my best friend and has gotten me through some very rough times. As heartbreaking as the experience was, I held my handsome little man while the vet administered the euthanasia, and he laid his little head against my chest and fell asleep forever. I know that’s what HE wanted, and I had to put my sadness aside for him. And as much as I loved him, somehow I think my husband loved him even more. They were best buds.












The People of the state of New York Vs. Joseph Belstadt. Dependent appellant (2025)
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH H. BELSTADT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
808
Decided: November 21, 2025
PRESENT: MONTOUR, J.P., SMITH, GREENWOOD, NOWAK, AND KEANE, JJ.
THOMAS J. EOANNOU, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). His conviction stems from the disappearance of the 17-year-old victim in September 1993 in Niagara County.
According to witnesses and defendant’s statements to the police after the victim’s disappearance, the victim entered defendant’s car in the early hours of September 19, 1993. The victim’s mother filed a missing person report after she and the victim’s friends were unable to locate her. The victim was discovered deceased in a ravine around a month later, an article of clothing knotted around her neck. According to expert testimony at trial, the victim’s body and clothing reflected signs of a struggle, the cause of her death was asphyxiation by strangulation, and the manner of death was homicide.
In the days following the victim’s disappearance, the police began contacting numerous individuals who had seen her in the days before her death. Given that defendant was the last independently confirmed person to see the victim alive after she got into his car, defendant was determined to be a suspect early in the investigation. Among other things, hundreds of pieces of evidence – hairs, fibers, and other material – were collected from the victim’s body and from vacuuming defendant’s car and sent to the Niagara County Forensic Laboratory. Over the years that followed, evidence was examined and reexamined, analyzed in-house by Niagara County, and contracted out to the Erie County Central Police Services Forensic Science Laboratory as well as labs out of state, and a consultant reviewed evidence in the early to mid-2000s. In 2017, Mark Henderson, a Niagara County forensic analyst who had worked on the case since its inception, reexamined, among other things, a particular hair found in defendant’s car that, in 1997, had been deemed “dissimilar” to the victim’s hair by the Erie County lab that had analyzed it. According to Henderson, by using training and experience he had gathered since that time, he determined that the hair matched the victim’s known pubic hair. Another visually matching hair was then discovered among those collected from defendant’s car. Both pubic hairs were genetically matched to the victim through DNA analysis of the attached root tissue. In addition, around that time, fibers consistent with carpet fibers in defendant’s car were found among the victim’s clothing. Defendant was indicted in April 2018. After lengthy pretrial practice and a mistrial occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, defendant was tried in 2021 and convicted of murder in the second degree, the sole indicted count. Defendant appeals, and we affirm.
Defendant contends that the conviction is not based on legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant preserved for our review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence (see generally People v McGovern, 214 AD3d 1339, 1340 [4th Dept 2023], affd 42 NY3d 532 [2024]), we conclude, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction of murder in the second degree (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Shortly after the victim’s disappearance, defendant himself admitted, and it was independently confirmed by other witnesses, that defendant had given the victim a ride in his car on September 19, 1993, at around 1:30 a.m. Although defendant claimed to have driven her a short distance to the stairs of a nearby church, that claim conflicted with the forensic evidence, namely the victim’s pubic hair found in different locations in defendant’s car. In addition, testimony at trial reflected defendant’s movements and behavior before and after he encountered the victim. After going to a nearby police station to complain about a recent traffic ticket at around 1:00 a.m., defendant declined an invitation to go to Canada with friends, instead opting to drive around because, according to those friends, he was upset over the tickets. While driving, defendant observed the victim and offered to give her a ride. According to his friends, when they returned from Canada, defendant’s car was not parked at his grandmother’s home, where defendant lived, or at his mother’s home. Another witness observed defendant alone in his car, which was wet, and defendant told the witness he had just washed it. In the days after, defendant appeared at various locations in an attempt at establishing a false alibi. He spoke to each of his four friends who had gone to Canada on the night that the victim disappeared, asking them to lie to the police and assert that defendant had gone with them, and defendant was absent from school during the week after the victim’s disappearance. Testimony also reflected that defendant had, in the summer of 1993, driven another young woman to a location near where the victim’s body would later be found. With respect to the element of intent, we note that the victim was found with clothing knotted around her neck, and that expert testimony at trial concluded that the state of her clothing and body reflected homicide by asphyxiation following a struggle. Further, the testimony of an individual who had been incarcerated with defendant on an unrelated charge reflected that defendant had admitted to strangling a girl in the early 1990s and leaving her body outdoors. We further conclude, after viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Monk, 57 AD3d 1497, 1499 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 785 [2009]; see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495).
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the opinion testimony of the expert pathologist, based upon, inter alia, his review of autopsy materials, was properly admitted at trial and did not violate defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation (see People v Ortega, 40 NY3d 463, 475-476 [2023]). “[T]he Confrontation Clause does not entirely preclude the use of information contained in testimonial autopsy reports,” and an expert may offer opinions related to the cause and manner of death if the expert has “used their independent analysis on the primary data,” including autopsy photographs, video recordings, and anatomical measurements (id. at 476-477; see People v Austin, 237 AD3d 736, 738 [2d Dept 2025]; People v Taveras, 228 AD3d 410, 412 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 1054 [2024]; People v Rivers, 225 AD3d 899, 901-902 [2d Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 929 [2024]). Here, the record reflects that the testifying expert, who did not perform or observe the autopsy, reached his conclusions based on an independent review of the proper materials rather than the conclusions of the performing medical examiner (see Austin, 237 AD3d at 738; cf. Ortega, 40 NY3d at 478).
We likewise reject defendant’s contention that his due process right to prompt prosecution was violated by the preindictment delay. In determining whether defendant was deprived of due process, we must consider the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442 [1975]), which are: “(1) the extent of the delay; (2) the reasons for the delay; (3) the nature of the underlying charge; (4) whether ․ there has been an extended period of pretrial incarceration; and (5) whether ․ there is any indication that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay” (id. at 445; see People v Johnson, 39 NY3d 92, 96 [2022]). These factors must be reviewed “in light of the particular factors attending to the specific case under scrutiny ․, there are no clear cut answers in such an inquiry, ․ [and] no one factor or combination of the factors ․ is necessarily decisive” (Taranovich, 37 NY2d at 445).
Although the delay in this case was substantial, the nature of the underlying charge was serious and defendant was not arrested on that charge until he was indicted (see People v Rogers, 103 AD3d 1150, 1151 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 946 [2013]). Moreover, although the delay in this case may have caused some degree of prejudice to defendant, the People satisfied their burden of demonstrating good cause for the delay (see id.; People v Chatt, 77 AD3d 1285, 1285 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 793 [2011]). Of note, the People submitted a sworn affidavit from Henderson, which presented a narrative of the investigative events since 1993, discussed the thousands of hours dedicated to the case, addressed the outside labs and consultants used to assist in bringing the investigation to a resolution, and explained the limitations of analyzing hundreds of car sweepings (see generally People v Johnson, 211 AD3d 1633, 1634 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 1111 [2023]). Contrary to defendant’s related contention, there was no need for a Singer hearing (see People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 255 [1978]) inasmuch as the record provided the court with “a sufficient basis to determine whether the delay was justified” (People v Ballowe, 173 AD3d 1666, 1668 [4th Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Rogers, 103 AD3d at 1151; People v Gathers, 65 AD3d 704, 704 [2d Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 859 [2009]).
Entered: November 21, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Background: Karen Merle Levy was born on October 28, 1954 to Bertram and Sylvia (nee Neifield) Levy in Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Bertram Elliott Levy was born on June 17, 1927 in Camden NJ and Sylvia was born on May 29, 1929 in Pennsylvania. After graduating from Camdem High School in 1944, Mr. Levy went on to serve in WWII, and upon returning home married Sylvia in the summer of 1950; the couple went on to have three children together: Karen, Eric, and Richard. Bertram was the chairman of the board for Parts Distributors Incorporated in Cherry Hill, and according to the 1950 census, Mrs. Levy’s profession was listed as ‘a secretary at a sweater manufacturer.’ According to her father, before she was killed Karen had recently made a ‘prayer shall’ for her brother, Rick, and she ‘was very creative, good at cooking and sewing. Not a great student.’ He went on to say that ‘she enrolled in home economics at Syracuse University, so you can imagine what kind of girl she was. And there were some who felt she was very pretty, and that’s how I felt too.’
Syracuse University: After graduating from Cherry Hill East High School in 1972, Karen went on to attend Syracuse University, majoring in Home Economics. According to Karen’s family, her hobbies included bowling, reading, and riding her bike, and those that knew her well said that she possessed a lot of ‘old-fashioned qualities’ and really excelled at cooking and sewing. At the time of her death she was working on making an afghan and had it with her when she left for New Jersey. Ms. Levy stood at 5 feet tall even, weighed between 100 to 105 pounds, and wore her dark brown hair at her shoulders; she also had brown eyes and wore gold-rimmed, ‘granny-type’ glasses.
At the time of her murder Karen was in a long-distance relationship with a young man named Gary Lieberman, who transferred to Cherry Hill East High School in the beginning of their junior year in 1970. Lieberman’s name came immediately after hers in their school’s yearbook, and because of that a part of me wonders if they were brought together for semi-logistical reasons. After graduating high school he went on to attend Monmouth College, located in West Long Branch, New Jersey.
In her daughters first few months away from home, Mrs. Levy said that she ‘couldn’t keep her in writing paper, she wrote to us and her grandmother and her friends all the time. She called home more than once a week.‘ The Levy’s saw Karen for the last time roughly three weeks before she disappeared, during parents weekend on October 28, 1972, which also happened to be her 18th birthday. At that time Karen shared with them her plans of borrowing one of her brothers cars to go and visit Gary the weekend of November 10, 1972, but he wound up needing it. So, she did what many other young students at SU did at the time: she posted a three-by-five index card on a bulletin board on campus that said ‘ride wanted’ that contained her name, contact information, and final destination. Mrs. Levy said that ‘she told her friends he sounded strange over the phone and asked them to come along with her to meet him. The man looked alright and she took the ride.’
Monmouth College: On November 9, 1972 a ‘non-student’ and self-proclaimed ‘businessman*’ from Livingston, NJ calling himself ‘Bill Lacey’ reached out to Levy by phone and agreed to take her to Monmouth College, and the two made plans to meet at the Upstate Medical Center near campus at 6 PM the following day (*one report said he claimed to be a ‘traveling salesman’). Levy was accompanied by her friend Paula Lippin and her boyfriend Mitchell Sakofs, and they were able to confirm that she did meet up with an individual that introduced himself as Bill Lacey and was last seen walking away from them in his company. She was last seen wearing a navy blue peacoat, blue bell bottom ‘dungarees,’ a multi-colored V-neck vest, and brown shoes; she was carrying with her a blue knapsack and told Gary she was due to arrive at around 11 PM.
Disappearance: When Karen never arrived at Monmouth police were immediately notified and she was officially listed as a ‘missing person’ due to the fact they had no solid evidence that she had been abducted or was forced into ‘Bill Lacey’s’ car. After they felt that her case wasn’t being taken seriously enough, the Levy’s hired two New Jersey private investigators to assist, including one named John Begley, who brought her disappearance to the attention of the Albany Branch of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on November 13, 1972. Also on the same date, Sylvia Levy reached out to the Newark Division of the FBI, and on November 14th the Identification Division was asked to release a missing persons notice. About her daughter, Mrs. Levy said ‘she loved college and she had no family problems. She was going to visit her boyfriend and she had a birthday present for him. Why would anyone assume she was a runaway?’ She also said that in the initial stages of her daughter’s disappearance things were mishandled by the Syracuse police department, who she said didn’t have the resources to make a thorough investigation. She also charged the department with ‘cynicism and callousness in not conducting a prompt probe of Karen’s disappearance, and that no one lifted a finger for days, and those days were crucial, because they would not believe in the honesty and the sincerity and goodness of our child.’ About the delay in the initial stages of the case, Sylvia said ‘you see the attitude of the authorities is: if you’re young and you disappear, you ran off. They besmith the kids as a group. And the moral of the story is: don’t be young.’
Three policing jurisdictions were investigating Levy’s case: University Police, local Syracuse law enforcement, and the NYS Troopers, and in the early parts of the investigation at least twelve detectives were assigned to work full time on the case. In the first few days after she disappeared investigators focused their search efforts on Sennett, NY after they received multiple reports on November 11th that a man was seen carrying what seemed to be an unconscious woman to his car. One of the women that reported the incident said she was driving on an isolated road when she saw a car parked next to a field and a man walking towards it while carrying a woman that appeared to be unconscious that was dressed in a blue coat and jeans. Unfortunately, nothing came of this.
Investigators combed the general Central New York area and expanded their search into New Jersey, but came up with nothing. Syracuse police conducted over 500 interviews over the course of the investigation and tracked down anyone and everyone that was confirmed to be in the area when Levy was last seen. They also investigated all locals that were named Bill Lacey (or had variations of the name) and spoke with other young women that requested rides in the same method as Levy and whether or not they had any strange encounters with a man that matched his description. Additionally, detectives checked out local newspapers looking for advertisements that were posted by men offering rides in the same time frame that Levy vanished.
Every single tip that investigators received regarding the disappearance of Karen Levy was looked into, and many of the leads were related to the bulletin boards on Syracuse University’s campus. Additionally, NYS Police used helicopters, airplanes, and dogs in their search efforts, and conducted foot searches all over the two most likely routes of travel from SU to Monmouth College, combing through long stretches of highways and secluded ‘lovers’ lanes’… but to no avail. Because Levy’s friend and her boyfriend were able to get a good look at ‘Bill Lacey,’ a sketch artist was able to come up with a composite drawing of him, which was shared all over New York state. According to them, the man looked like ‘half the guys in the country’ aside from his left eye, which was either crossed or unable to completely focus.
At the request of the Syracuse PD, the Albany Branch of the FBI (most likely as a cooperative measure, as they weren’t officially involved) conducted investigations regarding Levy’s disappearance in Oklahoma City, New York City, Chicago, Memphis, Charlotte, Newark, Dallas, Honolulu, and Detroit, which helped eliminate suspects. Because Ms. Levy left with Lacey voluntarily and of her own free will there was no violation of the Federal Kidnaping Statute., therefore the FBI didn’t ‘officially’ join in on the investigation. Despite this, Mr. and Mrs. Levy felt their daughter would never leave on her own with a stranger, and her father commented that: ‘it’s just not consistent with her or her nature to disappear purposefully,’ and about the possibility that someone may have taken his Karen he said that he had ‘no feeling toward that man who has abducted her, I can’t feel vindictive. We just want her home safe and sound. We don’t have any Thanksgiving plan, hopefully we will celebrate Karen’s safe return.’
The Levy’s knew that their daughter would never voluntarily go anywhere with a strange man that she didn’t know. and immediately knew that something sinister had happened to her. In December 1972 they posted a $2,500 reward for any information that lead to the return of their daughter (it was never redeemed), and paid for thousands of missing persons fliers that contained a picture of Karen on it along with the police composite sketch of ‘Bill Lacey’ as well as both of their complete physical descriptions.
Police tracked down a few young men that matched Bill Lacey’s description, and all of them were brought in for questioning and were released. One of the suspects was identified by both of Levy’s friends from a photograph, however when it came to a line-up they said they were only ‘uncertain’ it was him. After a long, in-depth interrogation the man passed a lie‐detector test, and was able to come up with an alibi for his whereabouts on November 10, 1972.
‘Bill Lacey:’ According to Karen’s friends, she had shared that she was slightly suspicious of the man that would be driving her to New Jersey after a weird conversations they had over the telephone the day before she vanished, as they were dotted with ‘hippie-type’ phrases such as ‘bummer’ and he seemed vague in his knowledge about the distance to Gary’s college. They were all surprised when ’Bill Lacey’ showed up dressed as a clean-cut businessman, wearing a grey suit with a vest, his brown hair cut short and parted neatly on the right; they also said that he was between 20 to 25 years old, roughly six feet tall, and told them that he was from Cleveland.
Detectives went to Upstate Medical Center where Lacey said he delivered medical supplies to, and spoke with members of their staff, and they said they had never heard of him. They also learned that two other coeds that were looking for rides were also contacted by a man named ‘Bill Lacey:’ one girl needed to get to Philadelphia and the other one to Boston, and in each case Lacey told them that he made weekly deliveries to their city. The girl in Philadelphia got spooked after she asked for a phone number and he simply hung up on her, and the one from Boston said when she told him that she wanted a friend to come with her he suddenly said that he needed to leave earlier than he originally anticipated and hung up on her.
One of the last people to talk to Karen during the final hours of her life was Gary, who had driven to Syracuse University the weekend prior to attend a rock concert on campus, and when he left Monday morning they had agreed to talk on the phone the following Thursday about her possibly coming to visit him the following weekend. He said that: ‘she said there was something fishy about the guy who offered her a ride. She said a lot of girls on her floor didn’t think she should take the ride.’ When she asked him what she should do, Lieberman thought about it briefly then said he ‘couldn’t make that decision. I told her I wanted to see her, but didn’t want her to take any unnecessary risk.’ He said that in response to this, she said they would ‘leave it that I’m coming down unless I give you a call.’ But he never heard from her again after that.
According to her high school friends Sherry Frepow and Michele Goldstein, who both went to attend Monmouth College with Gary, Karen had always bummed rides with friends on previous visits, and according to Frepow, ‘she never took rides with strangers, but she really wanted to come down that weekend. She was coming for Gary’s and my birthday. She mentioned over the phone the night before that the guy was kind of weird because he wasn’t charging her any money, and he seemed wrong about the time it took to get here. I didn’t want to think anything about it. You just never think that something like this could happen.’
After Karen talked to her boyfriend she spoke with her parents, and Mr. Levy said that: ‘she called all excited about getting a ride. She gave no details.’ Mr. Levy described Karen as ‘steady and reliable,’ and if anything, she was ‘too trustworthy,’ and that attending school at Syracuse University was the first time that she was ever away from home. According to them, she always called us and the call on Thursday was ‘nothing out of the ordinary and barely mentioned who she was getting a ride with, and she certainly didn’t tell us about her doubts of taking a ride with that man.’ About the individual, Bertram Levy said that ‘they described him later as a neat looking man, well dressed. Not a beatnik. Not a hippie in dungarees. Karen would never have accepted a ride with one of those.’ To this, Mrs. Levy shook her head and said ‘Oh, maybe she would have. We don’t know, we just don’t know.’
In a document I found that included a great deal of information related to the Levy case titled, ‘Hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives, Record Session, HR 4191 and HR 8722, Amendments to the Federal Kidnapping Statute, dated February 27, 1974 and April 10, 1974’ (which was obviously compiled before the apprehension of John E. Harris): ‘The Syracuse University Police Department’s initial report listed the only person who accompanied Karen to meet ‘Bill Lacey’ on November 10, as Amy Krackovitz, Karen’s roommate. However, two people, not one, accompanied Karen, and Amy Krackovitz was not one of them. Similarly, the report listed the suspected abductor as one ‘Charles Lacey,’ and the University Police has devoted some time and effort in preparing a preliminary background report on a ‘Charles Lacey’ for their initial report. However, Karen Levy’s abductor had identified himself as ‘Bill Lacey’ not ‘Charles,’ and again precious time was lost. In fact, it was not until two days after Karen’s disappearance that the Syracuse University Police Department mapped a coordinated plan of investigation. Yet, even after mapping the plan, it was not until the afternoon of November 13, when at the suggestion of the Levys’ private detective that the Syracuse University Police Department went to the ride boards to check for fingerprints on Karen’s ride notices, which were the tab type requiring anyone removing a tab with Karen’s phone number on it to touch the notice.’
Ted of the West Coast?’: Months ticked by, then eventually years, and Levy’s homicide remained unsolved. By the summer of 1974 the murders in Seattle had started, and the infamous ‘Ted of the West Coast’ had begun his reign of terror throughout the Pacific Northwest. Briefly, in the summer of 1974 it was speculated that the crazed killer had made his way to New York state and had something to do with the disappearance of Karen Levy, however that theory quickly was tossed out when her real killer was apprehended that fall. At the time of Levy’s disappearance in November 1972 Bundy was employed at Seattle’s Department of Law & Justice Planning (he was there from September 1972 to January 1973) and was in his first semester of law school at The University of Puget Sound in Tacoma. He was in a committed relationship with Elizabeth Kloepfer and was living at the Rogers Rooming House on 12th Avenue in Seattle’s University District.
Murder: According to an anonymous member of the Syracuse Police Department’s criminal investigation division, in late October 1974 ‘it was a confession to a friend by the suspect that finally helped to break the case.** Syracuse Deputy Police Chief John Dillon said that he got a tip from a friend of twenty-four-year-old John E. Harris of Cicero, NY who shared with him that he tried to stab thirty-four-year old Richard Bellinger with an ice pick on March 26, 1974, and that he killed Karen Levy. Bellinger was the business agent for John’s wife of a year-and-a-half Donna Lee Harris, who according to detectives was ‘a 21‐year‐old go‐go dancer.’ Unfortunately he told police that he didn’t get a good look at his attacker and wouldn’t be able to recognize him. Harris, who by that time had grown a big bushy beard, told investigators that Levy had gotten ‘hysterical’ when he attacked her and he killed her to ‘shut her up.’ During the interrogation his wife sat beside him, softly coaxing her husband to ‘tell them everything. If you did anything wrong, tell them.’ At that time he also volunteered that at the age of sixteen he had been arrested for rape and spent five years inside a reformatory. ** I have seen varying reports as to how police learned about the identity of John Harris: a different source says that while in jail in 1973 John’s brother Paul shared with another inmate what his brother had done to Levy, and that was eventually passed on to NYS investigators who arrested Harris as a result. Another article said that Paul told his girlfriend who told a friend who told another friend who eventually came forward and told law enforcement.
On Saturday, October 26, 1974 John E. Harris led investigators to the body of Karen Merle Levy in a shallow grave at his POE of five years: Ley Creek Sewage Treatment Plant in Salina, NY: she had been found underneath four feet of landfill and had been stabbed and strangled with a nylon stocking, which was still cinched around her neck. Detectives working the case theorized that Harris had hit Levy over the head with a shovel then dragged her to the landfill, where he strangled and buried her. Also at the scene investigators found a ring with Karen’s initials engraved on it, a medallion that had ‘keep holy the Commandments’ inscribed on it, and a set of keys, one of which fit the lock to her one-time dorm room. A 100% positive identification was made after a forensic dentist was brought in to examine Levy’s skeletal remains and according to Deputy Chief Dillon, the preliminary investigation had shown that Levy was killed less than an hour after she was last seen. After Karen’s body was discovered, Mr. Levy said that they could now ‘pick up our lives now and try to live a halfway normal life. We were hoping, wishing for a miracle, but did not truly expect it.’ According to Ken Levy, ‘for two years they didn’t give up hope, there was no closure for two years, when Karen’s body was finally recovered the family felt enormous relief, followed with sadness.’
According to an article published in The Syracuse Herald-Journal on September 17, 1975, John Harris implicated his brother Paul for the murder of Karen Levy in a series of letters, and claimed that he was with him that night in November 1972 when he picked her up and said that he was the killer, not him. Paul denied having anything to do with killing the young coed and after multiple interrogations and lie detector tests he was eventually cleared of any wrong-doing. In an article published in The Post-Standard on September 13, 1975, Paul said that he didn’t think his brother acted alone and that he thought ‘there was someone with him or someone forcing him to do it.’ When asked why he thought this, he said that John was ‘into some pretty heavy stuff’ and was ‘involved with gambling and the sale of drugs, as well as taking pictures of nude models: ‘John would pick the models up, sometimes from Syracuse University, and take them to a photo shoot where he would wait until the photographer was finished. Sometimes he would actually pose with her.’
Paul went on to say that John was involved with a group he dubbed ‘The Utica Bunch,’ and was ‘in this for the money, and maybe a little for the girls.’ When asked why he would want to blame him for the murder, Paul said he was asking himself the same thing and that ‘something happened in his mind. His memory is gone. Either he is trying to grasp onto the only escape left or it has just become a game for him. He probably doesn’t know I didn’t do that. I didn’t tell police. I just told my girlfriend who told somebody who told somebody. The police finally got wind of it.’ Paul Harris was a bartender by trade but after charges were dismissed he volunteered in an interview that he was thinking about leaving the area, saying the murder had ‘ruined his reputation’ and that he was at ‘the point where I might have to leave Syracuse. At least twice, enemies of John’s have actually tried to kill me.’ He also said that in November 1974 he was shot at while walking down Clinton Street, and in the beginning of September 1975 someone had tried to run him off the road on Route 81 by approaching him at an angle that ‘could only have been an attempt to get me.’ He also said that on one occasion a woman threw a drink in his face.
After Harris was held without bail, police records showed that in 1966 he was arrested on a rape charge and served five years in Coxsackie Reformatory. Pretrial proceedings began on November 1, 1974, and he was indicted on two counts of murder, along with additional charges of first‐degree rape and first‐degree sexual abuse. Additionally, John Harris was charged with attempted murder and possession of a dangerous weapon in relation to his crimes against Richard Bellinger.
Judge Gale ruled that Harris was unable to stand trial on December 23, 1974 and ordered him be sent to the Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Center on January 9, 1975, where he spent three months being evaluated. Although center professionals determined that he was capable of standing trial for Karen’s murder, two psychiatrists (one of them being the Head of the County’s Mental Health Department) said that he has ‘deteriorated steadily’ since his arrest. According to Chief Assistant District Attorney John Shannon, Harris was ‘capable of understanding the nature of the charges against him and assisting his attorneys in the defense of this case.’
At the sanity hearing, a psychiatrist from Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Center testified that the defendant told him that he was able to trick two separate doctors into believing that he was insane: ‘he (Harris) told me that when he was in his cell, he was told by the other inmates to keep looking at the floor. They told him to blink and mumble.’ At the hearing Harris took the stand and said that he didn’t know what his rights were when he gave the NYS Troopers a written confession, which was reportedly ‘peculiar and false.’ In it, he said that he drove her to the treatment plant and ‘asked her for a kiss,’ and when she refused he strangled her, and then ‘hit her and she hit me with her purse. So I knocked her out. She tried to claw my face so I hit her several times in the head. I thought she was unconscious. I took her out of the car and carried her on the lawn. I removed her jacket. The grass was wet so I rubbed her arm on the grass and splashed a mud puddle. She wouldn’t wake up. I started to cry. I walked around her, hoping she was all right.’ He said when he realized she was dead he stuffed her remains in an incinerator, and turned her all except her skull and bones. With a crowbar he crushed the bones to dust, and put them in a truck and buried ‘some place in Skaneateles.’
During his trial, Harris testified that he was ‘tired and sick’ when he spoke with police after his initial arrest, and that ‘when police asked him to sign the statement, he said, ‘shouldn’t I have a lawyer?” In response, they said, ‘if you don’t sign it, you’re going to be here all night until you do.’ He went on to say that during the interrogation he ‘had an upset stomach, and I was nervous and tired’ and that at one point a screaming match broke out between him and an investigator. He also claimed that the signature on the confession was forged and not his, which went nowhere. After Levy’s murder between November 1972 and October 1974 police had two separate (unrelated) interactions with Harris: one time he was pulled over for ‘failure to use his direction signal,’ and after he told the NYS Trooper he was ‘tired of being harassed by the fuzz’ they brought him into a nearby police station, questioned him for an hour, and was eventually issued a citation.
To the surprise of everyone, on July 25, 1975 Harris plead guilty to the rape and murder of Karen Levy because he was ‘tired of waiting for all the court actions to end.’ Under the terms of a plea bargain that was approved by the Levy family, he accepted a twenty year to life prison term for the murder, and began the sentence September 12, 1975. In an emotional interview with reporters, Harris said that he just wanted ‘to do my time and go home and lead a decent life.’ Mr. Levy said that he agreed with the plea bargain because ‘it gave them the best justice they were capable of getting at that point without having to go through a trial’ and that he ‘would prefer never to come face to face with Harris. That’s not going to bring Karen back. But it’s not like we’ve washed our hands of the thing.’ Harris was initially housed at Auburn Correctional Facility and after bouncing over a few prisons he was briefly moved to Clinton Correctional before going to Orleans Correctional Facility in 1992.
In September 1979 Harris attempted to appeal his conviction based on ‘arguments that he didn’t knowingly waive his right to remain silent or have his attorney present when he was questioned by police,’ and that he didn’t knowingly waive his right to a jury trial when he pleaded guilty. It was ultimately denied. In August of 2000 Harris was up for parole for the fourth time, but was denied due to the fact that he still ‘posed an imminent threat to community safety’ and was ‘incompatible with the welfare and safety of the community.’ According to an article published in The Post-Standard on August 6, 2000, he was cited (meaning he received a formal warning for violating rules/regulations) six times for breaking prison rules, including harassment, assaulting a prison guard, and property damage.
By 1999 Harris had completely changed his story again: in an article published in The Post-Standard on August 7, 2000, in an April 1999 interview with LE he said that he accepted responsibility for Karen’s death, however claimed he wasn’t the one that killed her. He went on to elaborate that he (along with some companions that he refused to name) planned on using Levy to transport drugs from Syracuse to New Jersey and their plan was to slip them into her luggage then blame her if they were stopped by law enforcement: ‘that way if we got stopped and frisked by the cops, it’s in their stuff, and we could write it off.’ He claimed it was ‘by chance’ that he met Karen and it was only the two of them in the car when they stopped for food at a Motel 7 on Seventh North Street just over the city line in Salina.
While Karen was inside the motel a second vehicle pulled up and they said they put the drugs in her bags, which were still in the car, but she noticed that ‘something was wrong’ and got upset. The men pulled Harris aside and as they were talking one of them ‘stabbed her in the stomach’ and he ‘just saw her fall to the floor. And I just… the feeling I got I almost vomited.’ The friends told him that he had to ‘get rid of her,’ and he had to ‘dump her body somewhere.’ He said that he ‘pulled her out of the car. She just reached up to me and said don’t let them hurt me anymore.’ When asked by investigators why he didn’t drop her off at a hospital, he said he was afraid because he was an ex-con that had ‘served time for grand larceny in 1967,’ and he ‘didn’t want to get in anymore trouble,’ and he ‘just ended up burying the girl. It was bothering me very much, in fact, it made me very emotional. I’d come home and I’d be very emotional with my wife. We’d start arguing over the littlest things. ‘Cuz it always drew back to me about Miss Levy. Most times I would have nightmares and I’d wake up.’ During that 1999 interview Harris also claimed that the incident ‘still haunted him,’ and that sometimes he would read newspaper clippings about the case over and over again: ‘and when I’m done reading the stories I just think I’m responsible for her death.’
About his release being denied Harris said that ‘it’s not that cut and dry.’ … ‘It leads people into thinking I’m actually guilty of this murder.’ If released Harris said that he wasn’t trying to fit into society and wasn’t interested in making friends with his neighbors: ‘I don’t wanna blend in with society, I wanna stay away from society. I just wanna be a recluse someplace. I just wanna go off by myself. I’m tired of people, and I’m tired of crap. I’ve put up with it for twenty-five-years, I just wanna be able to think and breathe.’
According to an article published in The Post Standard on August 7, 2000, while in prison Harris served as a ‘facilitator’ in ‘Network,’ a self-help, behavioral modification program at the prison and served as the program’s ‘institutional clerk’ and went to ‘victim awareness programs.’ About being up for parole so many times, he said that ‘it’s like it doesn’t matter what I do, what I accomplish, how much I give (the parole board) what I’m suppose to give them. they still rubber stamp me. They give me the same answer on every parole denial.’ From prison, Harris had some words for the Levy family: ‘no matter how much time passes, I’ll never get over it. But at the same time, of course her family will never get over it… So what can you tell them? Of course I’m sorry. I’m immensely, immensely sorry. But what good is that gonna do anybody? I can’t bring her back, I can’t undo what has already been done.’ Sadly I learned in a Facebook post made by Rick Levy in July 2022 that Harris’s parole had been approved and he was released from prison shortly after.
After Levy’s disappearance students at Syracuse University continued to use ‘the bulletin board method’ as a way of old-fashioned ‘ride-sharing,’ and there was no noticeable decline in the amount of students that stood around, bumming rides. One 17-year-old Syracuse University student said that she was ‘just a little more choosy,’ and that her ‘new attitude’ was based not so much on the disappearance of Karen Levy but more because the last time she had accepted a ride from a stranger, the person had raped her.
Strangely enough, Karen Levy is not the only young woman from New York state that Bundy was (briefly) suspected of killing: on November 2, 1974 Katherine Kolodziej disappeared after a night out at The Vault Tavern in Cobleskill, NY. The 17-year-old from Ronkonkoma was a freshman majoring in Equestrienne Studies at SUNY Cobleskill, and less than four weeks later on November 28, 1974 her remains were found on a rock wall on nearby McDonald Road in Richmondville, NY. It was reported that a yellow VW Beetle was seen driving away from the tavern on the evening Kathy was last seen alive, however at the time she was killed Bundy was placed on the phone in Salt Lake City (per the ‘1992 TB Multiagency Investigative Report’).
Mr. and Mrs. Levy were married for forty-six years when Bertram passed away at the age of 69 on October 12, 1996 in Union Township, NJ. According to his obituary, Mr. Levy worked at his job for fifty-four years, was a member and former president of the board of Temple Beth Shalom in Cherry Hill, a past VP and treasurer of the Jewish Geriatric Home, and a member of the Mizpah-Haddon Heights Lodge 191 Free and Accepted Masons. Sylvia Levy passed away on July 16, 2020 at the age of 91. I reached out to Rich Levy after I saw a post he made on Facebook asking that people reach out to the parole board on his family’s behalf regarding Harris being up for release, but I completely misread his tone and he seemed incredibly reluctant to speak to me due to the fact that it was too painful to talk about, so I dropped it. Because of that I didn’t include any details or pictures about his, Eric’s, or Gary Leiberman’s lives, past or present.
Works Cited:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ny-supreme-court/1163667.html
McQuiston, John T. ‘Suspect’s Friend Led to Arrest in ’72 Slaying of Jersey Student.’ October 28, 1974. Taken May 28, 2025 from https://www.nytimes.com/1974/10/28/archives/suspects-friend-led-to-arrest-in-72-slaying-of-jersey-student.html#
The New York Times. July 29, 1975. ‘Man Admits Guilt in Death Of Jersey Coed at Syracuse.’ Taken May 28, 2025 from https://www.nytimes.com/1975/07/29/archives/man-admits-guilt-in-death-of-jersey-coed-at-syracuse.html















































































































































Karen M. Levy (no relation to Lisa Levy out of Florida) was a student at Syracuse University that was majoring in Home Economics when she disappeared after accepting a ride from a stranger on November 10, 1972 (her remains weren’t discovered until October 1974). When researching for my article I came across the following document that gives a good amount of details about her background and murder.