‘Geology of the Shoshone Volcanics, Death Valley Region, Eastern California,’ Written by Richard Haefner (MA Thesis).

Geologic Setting:

Within the Black Mountains block of the Death Valley region of eastern California is a terrane composed primarily of Cenozoic intrusive and extrusive rocks, which covers an area of about 1,300 sq km. The volcanic rocks of this terrane are predominantly rhyolitic but also include dacitic, andesitic, and basaltic units. They appear to be genetically related to the Cenozoic deformational features of the block (Noble and Wright, 1954; Wright and Troxel, 1971a, 1971b). The extrusive rocks that have been mapped thus far are mostly lava flows and air-fall tuffs, but ash-flow tuffs form much of the lower part of the volcanic sequence in the southern part of the field (L. A. Wright, personal commun.). Included within the rhyolitic rocks is an accumulation of lava flows and tuffs, as much as 900 m thick, to which the name “Shoshone Volcanics” is here applied and which is the subject of this summary report.

High-altitude imagery of southern and central Death Valley. Image NASA ERTS 1125-17554 band 7, 25 November 1972; copy produced by Drew P. Smith, California Division of Mines and Geology.

Although the field is incompletely explored, it appears to consist dominantly of acid intrusive and extrusive rocks; rocks of intermediate to basic composition are also present but subordinate,

Clastic sediments derived from the igneous rocks, together with evaporites, were deposited in local basins (Drewes, 1963). Some of these rocks contain commercial borate deposits. Two major sediment accumulations have been named Copper Canyon Formation (Curry, 1941; Drewes, 1963, p. 32) and Furnace Creek Formation (Noble, 1941, p. 956).


DESCRIPTION

The Shoshone Volcanics are exposed almost continuously in a belt about 26 km long, which extends northward (Fig. 1). They also are exposed in more westerly parts of the Greenwater Range and in the Black Mountains.

Figure 1. Distribution of the Shoshone Volcanics in southeast Greenwater Range (Eagle Mountain quadrangle) and Dublin Hills (Shoshone quadrangle).

In the area of Figure 1, the Shoshone Volcanics overlie Cambrian sedimentary rocks, Cenozoic quartz monzonite plutons, and older acid volcanic rocks with an erosional unconformity. The contact between the two accumulations of volcanic rock shows marked angular discordance. Southwest of the area shown in Figure 1, the Shoshone Volcanics also overlie ash-flow tuffs and andesite lava flows. The eroded surface of the Shoshone Volcanics is in turn overlain by air-fall tuffs and lava flows of the Greenwater Volcanics. This contact commonly also shows angular discordance. As the dip direction of all three volcanic accumulations is generally eastward, the angular unconformities suggest continued eastward tilting of fault blocks during emplacement of the volcanic rocks. Dark colored lava flows of basaltic and andesitic composition overlie the Shoshone Volcanics in some places.

The Shoshone Volcanics are prominently layered, the layers producing a striped landscape colored in various shades of pink, yellow, and gray. A regular sequence of layers is obvious, even from a distance. A yellow layer is generally overlain successively by a gray layer, a pink layer, locally a second gray layer, and another yellow layer (Table 1). At many localities, three or four of these sequences are exposed in layer-cake fashion on a single slope, individual sequences being 45 to 120 m thick. The sequences on steeper slopes produce cliffs (gray and pink layers), alternating with benches (yellow layers).

TABLE 1. TERMINOLOGY AND INTERPRETATION OF LAYERING IN SHOSHONE VOLCANICS
table

As the volcanic rocks dip eastward, the best views of the layer sequences are from the west side of the mountains. The sequences in the Dublin Hills are among the best exposed (Chesterman, 1973) and are also easily accessible. These dominate the view eastward as one travels toward Salsberry Pass from Greenwater Valley.


CORRELATION AND AGE

The Shoshone Volcanics are equivalent to a part of Drewes’s “older volcanics” in the Funeral Peak quadrangle to the west of the area shown in Figure 1 (Drewes, 1963). This unit is lithologically similar to the Shoshone Volcanics even to the zones within individual lava flows, and it also overlies eroded quartz monzonite plutons and underlies Greenwater Volcanics.

A tentative age for the Shoshone Volcanics may be inferred from isotope ages of rock units elsewhere in the volcanic field. Fleck (1970, p. 2810) reported seven K-Ar ages for “older volcanics” from the Funeral Peak quadrangle: three from Dante’s View and four from Hidden Springs, The dates from Dante’s View (6.32 ± 0.13, 6.34 ± 0.13, 6.49 ± 0.13) are clearly younger than those from Hidden Spring (8.02 ± 0.16, 7.60 ± 0.30, 7.77 ± 0.15, 8,02 ± 0.16). These yield an early Pliocene age for Hidden Spring and a middle Pliocene age for Dante’s View, based on the time scale of Evernden and others (1964). Although the “older volcanics” of Drewes include more than the equivalent of the Shoshone Volcanics, the early to middle Pliocene dates fit the permissible interval allowed the Shoshone Volcanics by radiometric dating of the quartz monzonite plutons and the Greenwater Volcanics. The former have yielded middle to late Miocene K-Ar dates (Stern and others, 1966; Armstrong, 1966). The Greenwater Volcanics, on the other hand, have yielded late Pliocene K-Ar dates (Fleck, 1970). The early to middle Pliocene age for the Shoshone Volcanics thus indicated may be refined when more detailed correlations of volcanic units are made, and when the age of the volcanic rocks underlying the Shoshone Volcanics is better known.


PETROGRAPHY

The Shoshone Volcanics consist primarily of four lithotypes: (1) gray perlitic vitrophyre, (2) red-brown to pinkish-gray felsophyre, (3) yellow felsophyre, and (4) yellow devitrified tuff (Table 1).

Phenocrysts of the Vitrophyre and Felsophyre. Phenocrysts comprise 3 to 20 percent of the total rock volume (Table 2); the remainder is glass or cryptocrystalline groundmass. Some of the layer sequences are crystal rich, others are crystal poor (Haefner, 1972). The Dublin Hills sequences are crystal poor. Crystal-rich sequences overlie crystal-poor sequences in the vicinity of Brown Peak.

TABLE 2. APPROXIMATE MODAL COMPOSITIONS, BY CONVENTIONAL POINT COUNTING

Crystal-poor eruptive unit*
(4,200 points)
(%)
Crystal-rich eruptive unit&dagg;er
(2,000 points)
(%)
Groundmass (glass)97.7581.8
Plagioclase2.0211.7
Biotite0.120.6
Hornblende0.074.7
Opaques0.021.2
Augite/hypersthene0.02tr.
Total100.00100.0
*Dublin Hills, average of 21 vitrophyre thin sections from one lava flow.
West of Brown Peak, average of 10 vitrophyre thin sections from one lava flow.

Plagioclase, the only feldspar, forms the largest (4 mm) and most abundant phenocrysts. Most crystals are andesine, but the composition ranges from oligoclase to labradorite.

Hornblende forms euhedral prisms to 1.5 mm long. It occurs as ordinary hornblende (pleochroic in green and brown), and as the varieties variously known as oxyhornblende, lamprobolite, or basaltic hornblende (pleochroic in red, green, and brown). Crystals of the latter variety are commonly rimmed with opaque minerals. Oxyhornblende occurs only in the pink felsophyre; ordinary hornblende occurs in the vitrophyre and yellow felsophyre.

Biotite occurs as euhedra to 1.5 mm in maximum dimension. It, too, occurs as two varieties: ordinary biotite (pleochroic in green and brown), and a type which, by analogy with hornblende, may be called oxybiotite (pleochroic in red, green, and brown). Oxybiotite is commonly rimmed with opaques, and it occurs exclusively with oxyhornblende in the pink felsophyre.

Opaque minerals, largely magnetite, occur as small anhedral to euhedral grains from dust size to 0.3 mm, and as larger masses partly to completely replacing oxyhornblende and oxybiotite. Orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene form euhedral phenocrysts that may be as large as the hornblende and biotite but are much less common.

A xenocrystic character is inferred for some grains that are rounded or embayed. Quartz grains as much as 1 mm in diameter occur in a few thin sections and are consistently rounded or embayed. Species that occur as phenocrysts also commonly show such outlines.

Groundmass of the Vitrophyre and Felsophyre. The glass groundmass of the vitrophyre commonly is gray to black. Brown glass occurs as a local variation that is mixed in swirls and patches with gray glass. The glass contains abundant pyroxene crystallites of several habits. Perlitic structure is nearly ubiquitous. In thin section, concentric fractures outline spheres with centers spaced at intervals of 0.5 to 1.0 mm and associated with a boxwork of planar fractures. Spherulites, 0.1 to 30 cm, occur in the glass but are confined to the several meters of vitrophyre along the margins of the red felsophyre (Fig. 2). Some spherulites are hollow and contain quartz crystals, agate, or opal.

Figure 2. Features of typical eruptive unit in Shoshone Volcanics.

The groundmass of the yellow felsophyre is cryptocrystalline. The presence of the alteration mineral jarosite is indicated by x-ray diffraction analysis. Magnetite commonly is absent. Relict perlitic fractures are locally present, indicating that the yellow felsophyre groundmass was originally glass, and that it acquired its present crystallinity through devitrification.

The groundmass of the red felsophyre is cryptocrystalline. The red to pink color, which is particularly conspicuous around magnetite microphenocrysts and around the opacitized rims of oxyhornblende and oxybiotite, is produced by abundant patches of hematite. In contrast to the vitrophyre and yellow felsophyre, the red felsophyre is vesicular; small vesicles to 2 mm are nearly ubiquitous, but large vesicles to 1 cm also occur, most of them adjacent to the vitrophyre (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Distribution of megascopic vesicles in red felsophyre.

Devitrified Yellow Tuff. The same phenocryst species as found in the vitrophyre and felsophyre are found in the tuff matrix. The matrix has been devitrified and is now cryptocrystalline, with only rare traces of the original glass shards. Magnetite appears to be absent in the matrix, whereas jarosite is present. Essential pumice lapilli (devitrified) and accidental lapilli and blocks of volcanic rocks are the most common clasts; clasts of sedimentary and metamorphic rocks are rare. Vitrophyre clasts are absent nearly everywhere, but yellow and red felsophyre clasts are common.

Two localities have been found where the tuff is not devitrified. The most accessible of these is the lowest tuff exposed on the west side of the Dublin Hills where vitrophyre lapilli and glass shards are abundant, and jarosite does not occur in the matrix.

Paleomagnetic Properties of the Rocks. Ninety-six determinations of paleomagnetic direction were made on vitrophyre and red felsophyre of the layer sequences only because yellow felsophyre and tuff commonly are not magnetically susceptible. In each case, strike and plunge of the remanant magnetization was determined. As the rocks are relatively young, the orientation of the remanant magnetization should approximately parallel the magnetic direction of the Earth’s present field, after correcting for postcooling deformation.

All the layer sequences examined exhibit normal polarity, except for specimens from exposures of one layer sequence, which are reversed (NW1/4 sec. 3, T. 22 N., R. 5 E.).

All the vitrophyre samples, including those from the reversed sequence, have directions of remanant magnetization which parallel that predicted from the present field (Fig. 4). However, among specimens from the red felsophyre zone, fewer than half have remanant directions that parallel the predicted direction; the remainder have remanant directions with widely varying strikes and plunges. It appears that only the vitrophyre can be relied upon to be a faithful recorder of the Earth’s magnetic field at the time of emplacement.

Figure 4. Determination of paleomagnetic direction.


INTERPRETATION OF THE LAYER SEQUENCES

Types of Deposits. Within each yellow layer is a deposit, about 9 m thick, of well-stratified tuff. The remainder of the layer is yellow felsophyre (Table 1). The tuffs, which consist of interbedded lapilli-rich and lapilli-poor strata, are interpreted as air-fall tuffs. The tuff deposits divide the yellow color bands into additional mappable units, or zones (Table 1).

The sequence of zones between tuff deposits is interpreted as a single rhyolite lava flow (Fig. 2; Haefner, 1969). Glass shards, fiamme, and other characteristics of ash-flow deposits are absent in these zones. In addition, laminae in the red felsophyre zone are locally warped into folds, indicating that the magma flowed as a coherent mass. That this sequence of zones constitutes only one lava flow is evidenced by exposures of flow margins. Four flow margins are exposed in the Dublin Hills; at such localities, the red felsophyre constitutes a core, around which are wrapped the upper vitrophyre and yellow felsophyre zones to become the lower vitrophyre and yellow felsophyre zones (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Cross-section sketch of lava flow margin in exposure of Shoshone Volcanics near Miller Spring. Flow margin overlain by another eruptive unit of Shoshone Volcanics. Not drawn to scale; length of section approximately 250 ft.

Alteration. The yellow felsophyre is interpreted as altered vitrophyre (Haefner, [969, 1973). Evidence for this inference is the presence of relict perlitic fractures and the observation that yellow felsophyre merges with unaltered vitrophyre inward from both the upper and lower flow surfaces. Thus, a lava flow appears to consist essentially of a red felsophyre core encased in a vitrophyre sheath; the outer portions of the sheath have been altered, as have adjacent tuff deposits. Alteration is expressed as devitrification, the growth of jarosite, and the disappearance of magnetite.

Altered acid volcanic rocks are usually distributed about centers of fumarolic or hydrothermal activity. The Shoshone lava flows are unusual in that the altered rock occurs as a sheet like body at the glassy top and at the glassy base of each lava flow. However, such alteration may not be unique to Death Valley; there are at least two localities in the Soviet Union from which apparently similar altered lava flows of acid composition have been described (Nasedkin, 1963).

A hypothesis for the origin of this alteration in the Shoshone Volcanics, which involves the interaction of magmatic with meteoric volatiles during the cooling of the flows, has been presented elsewhere (Haefner, 1969, 1973).


EMPLACEMENT OF A TYPICAL ERUPTIVE UNIT

Crust of the Active Lava Flow. At the top of each lava flow that is overlain by a tuff deposit, veinlets of tuff extend downward into the flow, outlining individual blocks of yellow felsophyre (altered vitrophyre); locally, the blocks are pumiceous. These blocks apparently constituted a rubble crust formed by the chilling and breaking of lava on the upper surface of the active flow. The crust, about 4.5 m thick, composes only 3 to 9 percent of the total flow thickness; furthermore, crustal thickness does not depend on the thickness of the lava flow (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Thickness of upper crust of rubble in six lava flows of Shoshone Volcanics.

Evidence of a rubble crust at the base of the lava flow would be generally difficult to detect, because tuff veinlets do not outline the rubble blocks. Nevertheless, ghostly remnants of angular blocks in the yellow felsophyre (altered vitrophyre) are observable at some localities and apparently originated as rubble. The lower crust is relatively thin, and massive, unaltered vitrophyre composes most of the part of the flow that underlies the red felsophyre zone (Fig. 2). If the lower crust was about as thick as the upper crust, then 80 to 95 percent of the lava flow remained liquid while the flow was active.

This large proportion of liquid magma contrasts with that inferred for many other acid lava flows, which are block lavas. These contained a much higher proportion of rubble during their active stage than do the flows of the Shoshone Volcanics. The overlying flows of the Greenwater Volcanics, exposed near Brown Peak, are block lavas. One measured section shows a flow to have been 70 percent rubble and only 30 percent liquid during its active stage.

Formation of Massive Vitrophyre. Adjacent to the rubble crusts are thick layers of massive gray vitrophyre and massive yellow felsophyre (altered vitrophyre). Together they form a sheath that encases the red felsophyre core of the flow. Patches of gray vitrophyre within the massive altered vitrophyre resemble rubble crust (Fig. 2), but they are not, because flow laminae or layers of spherulites can be traced across the patches into the adjacent vitrophyre, thus demonstrating that the patches are not rotated blocks.

The massive vitrophyre, fresh and altered, represents lava which must have chilled to a glassy rock only after movement of the lava ceased. Otherwise, the chilled glassy rock would have been broken and become part of the rubble crust. This chilling took place at least in part after the flow margin stopped advancing, because the massive vitrophyre sheath extends to the flow margin (Fig. 5), The chilling to form vitrophyre could have begun in less mobile parts of the flow during the active stage, particularly in portions of the flow near the vent (Fig. 7).

Figure 7. Interpretation of emplacement of an eruptive unit. Massive vitrophyre may have formed in stable crust areas of active lava flow but also formed after lava flow ceased advancing. Not drawn to scale.

Formation of the Felsophyre Core. An emplaced and cooling lava flow consisted of a molten core surrounded by a vitrophyre sheath (Fig. 7). The layers of massive vitrophyre must have continued to thicken as cooling proceeded, until conditions favored creation of features that characterize the lava flow core, namely, vesicularity, hematite stain, oxyhornblende and oxybiotite, and primary cryptocrystallinity, as contrasted with crystallinity caused by devitrification.

Except for local pumiceous rock in the rubble crust, only the felsophyre core is vesicular. This indicates that the lava, instead of degassing completely when it reached the Earth’s surface, retained an appreciable quantity of gas in solution until after the flow was emplaced and had cooled for some time.

Lava flows of basic composition are generally devoid of evidence of delayed vesiculation, probably because they have a lower melt viscosity. The proportion of acid lava flows that display evidence of delayed vesiculation, is unknown, because detailed descriptions of the interiors of acid lava flows are rare. The delayed vesiculation probably is responsible for the other characteristic features of the red felsophyre, based on the following evidence: On heating in air to about 750°C, ordinary hornblende changes to oxyhornblende (Belovsky, 1891; Kozu and others, 1927; Barnes, 1930). This process is one of oxidation and is accompanied by resorption around the crystal margins, the products generally including iron oxides and pyroxene (Deer and others, 1962).

The conversion of ordinary hornblende to oxyhornblende and of biotite to oxybiotite in the flow interior probably occurred with vesiculation, the exsolved gases providing the necessary oxidizing environment. Because hematite, the colorant of the lava flow core, is concentrated around oxyhornblende and oxybiotite crystals, it probably formed as a resorption product.

Because oxidation is an exothermic process, additional heat probably was generated in the molten lava flow core upon vesiculation. The oxidation of hornblende, experimentally, suggests that the temperature of the molten core was at least 750°C when the oxidation began. The additional heat provided by the oxidation apparently was sufficient to maintain the vesiculating molten core in a liquid state long enough for ions to migrate through the miscous melt and organize themselves as minute crystals. Thus the cryptocrystallinity of the red felsophyre groundmass also appears to have been favored by the delayed vesiculation.

Vesicle Collapse in the Felsophyre Core. The walls of vesicles are more coarsely crystalline than the rest of the ground mass. Streaks of similar material, observed in thin section, demonstrate the partial to complete collapse of vesicles (Fig. 8). Collapsing may have occurred when exsolving gases became depleted in the melt, or when the falling temperature caused a reduction in gas pressure to the point where it could no longer support the vesicle walls. The relatively large vesicles, which occur at the top and base of the red felsophyre zone, may have become “frozen” in highly viscous lava close to the chilled vitrophyre.

Figure 8. A. Photomicrograph of collapsed vesicles in red felsophyre (crossed nichols). Coarsely crystalline walls of vesicles show as light streaks. Arrows point to tridymite, which filed in partially collapsed vesicles, Light streak above tridymite patch on right is completely collapsed vesicle, without tridymite filling. Length of photo, 3 mm. B. Large vesicles in red felsophyre near bottom of zone. Vesicles are lined with druses of silica minerals.

The peculiar paleomagnetic properties of the red felsophyre may be related to vesicle collapse. About 40 percent of determinations on red felsophyre yield magnetic directions that parallel the predicted directions of the rocks. The red felsophyre, even though it has been oxidized by exsolved gases, evidently can be a faithful recorder of the Earth’s magnetic field, just as the vitrophyre can. Thus, the remaining determinations that do not yield the predicted magnetic direction seem best explained by mechanical rotation of mineral grains perhaps related to vesicle collapse. No other rotation is apparent as the paleomagnetism of the massive vitrophyre, particularly in the flow margins, demonstrates that the Curie point in the outer part of the lava flow was crossed only after the lava flow had stopped advancing. If this interpretation is correct, then the collapse of vesicles in the red felsophyre took place below 580°C, the measured Curie point of the rock.

Mechanism of Lava Flow Advance. Since freshly fallen tuff is notoriously susceptible to erosion but is conformable with the overlying flows, the lava flows must have moved over the tuff immediately after the tuff was deposited. Therefore, tuff is taken to represent deposits of explosions that cleared the vent just prior to a flow effusion.

The tuff deposits, which were unconsolidated lapilli and ash at the times the lava flows moved over them, are virtually undisturbed. Typically, the tuff fragments that are mixed into the overlying lava flow rock occur within 10 cm of the contact. In addition, the surfaces of the tuff layers apparently are unscoured by the overlying flows. Individual layers at the tops of tuff deposits can be traced for nearly 1 km. Therefore, a typical lava flow advanced without disturbing the underlying loose tuff. The nature of the flow margins and the existence of rubble crust at the base of the typical flow indicate that it advanced with a simple rolling tractor-tread motion, the crust that formed at the upper surface being dragged beneath the flow as it advanced (Fig. 7).

Although the areal extent of individual lava flows is obscured by abundant faults, individual flows have been traced continuously for as much as 5.5 km. A lava flow in the Dublin Hills that contains distinctive fragments of basaltic rock may be correlative with a similar lava flow exposed as far as 19.3 km north of the Dublin Hills.

Considered as a group, the lava flows of the Shoshone Volcanics appear to have filled the valleys. A map of the area near Brown Peak in the Eagle Mountain quadrangle, for example, shows flows accumulated which filled an ancient valley that possessed a relief of about 300 m (Haefner, 1972, Pl. 2).

The tractor-tread motion, the large proportion of liquid lava in the active flows, and the apparent extensiveness of some lava flows suggest a high fluidity for the Shoshone lava flows. This might be an effect of high initial temperature (Gibbon, 1964), but the presence of phenocrysts of the lava suggests a limited temperature range comparable to the range of the relatively viscous lava assumed for the porphyritic flows of block rhyolite. Thus, apparently high fluidity of the Shoshone rhyolite lava flows is more likely an effect of a high content of dissolved volatiles than of a high initial temperature, the volatiles being largely retained in solution during the advance of the flows.


REFERENCES CITED

Armstrong, R. L., 1966, K-Ar dating using neutron activation for Ar analysis: Granitic plutons of the eastern Great Basin, Nevada and Utah: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acts, v. 30, no. 6, p. 565-600.

Barnes, V. E., 1930, Changes in hornblende at about 800°C: Am. Mineralogist, v. 15, p. 393.

Belovsky, Max, 1891, Über die Anderungen, welche die Optischen Verhältnisse der gemeinen Hornblende beim Glühen erfahren: Neues Jahrb. Mineralogie, Bd. 1, p. 291-292.

Chesterman, Charles w., 1973, Geology of the northeast quarter of Shoshone quadrangle, Inyo County, California: California Div. Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 18.

Curry, H. D., 1940, Mammalian and avian ichnites in Death Valley [abs.]: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 52, no. 12, p. 1979.

Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J., 1962, Rock-forming minerals, Vol. 2: New York, John Wiley & Sons,

Drewes, Harald, 1963, Geology of the Funeral Peak quadrangle, California, on the east flank of Death Valley: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 413, 78 p.

Evernden, J. F., Savage, D. E., Curtis, G. H., and James, G. T., 1964, Potassium-argon dates and the Cenozoic mammalian chronology of North America: Am. Jour, Sci., v. 262, p. 145-098.

Fleck, R. J., 1970, Age and tectonic significance of volcanic rocks, Death Valley area, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 81, p. 2807-2816.

Gibbon, D. L., 1964, Origin and development of the Star Mountain rhyolite [Ph.D. dissert.]: Houston, Rice Univ., 119 p.

Haefner, Richard, 1969, Emplacement and cooling history of a rhyolite lava flow and related tuff at Deudman Pass, near Death Valley, California [M.S. thesis]: University Park, Pennsylvania State Univ., 82 p.

______ 1972, Igneous history of a rhyolite lava flow series near Death Valley, California [Ph.D. dissert]: University Park, Pennsylvania State Univ., 281 p.

______ 1973, Alteration of rhyolite near Death Valley, California: A newly recognized phenomenon: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs (Ann. Mtg.), v. 5, no. 7, p. 647,

Kozu, S., Yoshiki, B., and Kani, K., 1927, Notes on the study of the transformation of common hornblende into basaltic hornblende at 750°C: Tohoku Univ. Sci. Repts., 3d ser., v. 3, no. 2, p. 143-159.

Nasedkin, V. V., 1963, Water-bearing volcanic glasses of acid composition—Their genesis and alteration: Acad. Sci. USSR (text not translated).

Noble, L. F., 1941, Structural features of the Virgin Spring area, Death Valley, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 52, no, 7, p. 941-1000.

Noble, L. F., and Wright, L. A., 1954, Geology of the central and southern Death Valley region, California, in Jahns, R. H., ed., Geology of southern California: California Div. Mines and Geology Bull. 170, p. 143-160.

Stern, T. W., Newell, M. F., and Hunt, C. B., 1966, Uranium-lead and potassium-argon ages of parts of the Amargosa thrust complex, Death Valley, California: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 550—B, p. 142-147.

Wright, L. A., and Troxel, B. W., 1971a, Thin-skinned megaslump model of Basin Range structure us applicable to the southwestern Great Basin: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs (Ann. Mtg.), v. 3, no, 7, p. 758.

______ 1971b, Evidence for tectonic control of volcanism, Death Valley: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs (Cordilleran Sec.), v. 3, no. 2, p. 221.

High-altitude vertical aerial photograph near southeastern end of Greenwater Range. Pale-colored racks in left of center of photograph are marine Tertiary volcanic rocks described by Haefner [see preceding article]. The rocks also crop out on northwest [left] side of Dublin Hills [right of center]. Amargosa River flows south across photograph. Pale-colored area on right is underlain by flat-lying lake sediments deposited during an interval when the flow of the Amargosa River was blocked. Part of photo U.S. Air Force 374V 197, 6 September 1968; courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania versus Richard Charles Haefner: Argued December 6, 1977, Decided March 9, 1979.

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Richard Charles Haefner, Appellant. 264 Pa. Superior Ct. 144 (1979), 399 A.2d 707.

Argued December 6, 1977, decided March 9, 1979.

*145 Richard A. Sprague, and with him, Pamela W. Higgins and Michael K. Simon, Philadelphia, for appellant.

D. Richard Eckman, District Attorney, and with him, John A. Kenneff, Assistant District Attorney, Lancaster, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.

VAN der VOORT, Judge: The appellant, Richard Charles Haefner, was charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse and corruption of the *146 morals of a minor. A jury trial commenced on January 27, 1976, in Lancaster County and on February 3, 1976, the presentation of evidence having concluded, the case was submitted to the jury. As more fully detailed below, the trial judge, on the latter date, sua sponte declared a mistrial, based upon the jury’s failure to arrive at a verdict.

Thereafter, the appellant was scheduled to be tried again on the same charges. Inter alia, he filed a pretrial motion to quash indictments, based upon the argument that the trial court erred in its declaration of a mistrial, and that a second trial on the same charges would therefore be violative of his right to not be placed in double jeopardy. The lower court denied this motion and the appellant, on June 29, 1976, appealed that denial to our Court. The Commonwealth filed a motion to quash the appeal, contending that the order denying the appellant’s motion to quash the indictments was interlocutory. This Court granted the Commonwealth’s motion.

Appellant thereafter filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. That Court, by a Per Curiam Opinion, on June 3, 1977, held that a denial of a pre-trial motion to quash an indictment, where the motion alleges that a second trial will violate a defendant’s right not to be placed twice in jeopardy, is a final order, immediately subject to appellate review upon an appeal. Commonwealth v. Haefner, 473 Pa. 154, 373 A.2d 1094 (1977) (Former Chief Justice Jones not participating; Dissenting Opinion filed by Justice O’Brien, in which Justice Nix joined). Thus, the case was remanded to our Court for a determination of the appeal on the merits.

The record shows that appellant was tried before a Lancaster County jury from January 27, 1976 through February 3, 1976 on charges that he had engaged in indecent sexual contacts with a minor. Twenty-nine (29) witnesses testified during the course of the five days of trial. We need only highlight some of the most salient evidence and events of the trial for purposes of this Opinion.

The alleged victim was a twelve year old boy who claimed that the appellant, who employed him and other youths in a *147 small family business, had engaged in sexual contacts in a garage which was part of the business premises. The incident was not reported to anyone by the boy until a month and a half after it allegedly took place. The appellant, who completely denied the charge, was an educator of some standing who had no prior criminal record.

After the trial court charged the jury on the morning of February 3, 1976, it retired at 11:50 A.M., to begin deliberations. A luncheon recess in these deliberations was observed. At 5:10 P.M., the jury returned to the courtroom, whereupon the following colloquy evolved:

THE COURT: Mr. Foreman, has the jury reached a verdict? BY THE FOREMAN: No, sir. THE COURT: Well, members of the jury, as I stated and as you fully realize, this trial started last Tuesday, and I know you’ve been deliberating all afternoon, I know that the charge to the jury was completed about ten minutes of eleven. I understand that you returned from your lunch about 1:00, and have been deliberating since then. And under these circumstances, I’m going to direct that you return to the room for further deliberation, and I want to say to you that in order to return a verdict, each juror must agree thereto, that jurors have a duty to talk with another and to deliberate with a view to reaching an agreement, if it can be done without violence to individual judgments. Each juror must decide the case for himself, but only after an impartial consideration of the evidence with his fellow jurors. In the course of deliberations, a juror should not hesitate to re-examine his own views and change his opinion if convinced he should do this. No juror should surrender his honest conviction as to the weight or effect of the evidence solely because of the opinion of his fellow jurors or for the mere purpose of returning a verdict. And, having stated that to you, members of the jury, I’m going to direct that you now return for further deliberation.
*148 The jurors retired again at 5:10 P.M., to resume their deliberations. However, at 5:35 P.M., the jury returned to the courtroom, whereupon the record shows the following:

THE COURT: Mr. Foreman, the Court has been informed that the jury has a question, and the question is written out, is that correct? BY THE FOREMAN: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Will you hand it to the Clerk, so he can hand it to me, please, Sir? (Whereupon, the Court examines the question, at this point.) THE COURT: Will counsel approach the bench? (Whereupon, a discussion ensued off the record, at this point.) THE COURT: A question which has been addressed to The Court is: Your Honor, we the jury would like to hear the testimony of Sergeant Crump and Sergeant Snyder pertaining to the events which took place in the police station when questioning the Defendant. Also, the cross examination of the prosecuting officers. Members of the jury, the conduct of a trial requires that it is your recollection of the testimony which will be used in your deliberations. You have heard the testimony from the witness stand, you have heard the arguments of counsel, and you have heard The Court’s instructions as to the law and the responsibility of the jury and so, it will be necessary for you in your continuing deliberations, to rely solely on your recollection of the testimony which was given. Now, it’s The Court’s understanding, you are ready to go for dinner and it is twenty of six, so you will be taken by the Tipstaff for your dinner and then, you can deliberate further after dinner.
The jury then left the courtroom for supper and at 6:38 P.M., resumed deliberations. When they next returned to the courtroom it was 9:15 P.M., and the following colloquy took place:

*149 THE COURT: Mr. Foreman, the jury has been deliberating since I imagine about 1:00, the charge was completed about a quarter of twelve, and I understand that you went to lunch and your returned about 1:00, and were here until about 6:30, and then I understand you came back between 7:30 and a quarter of eight. It’s now after 9:15, which means that you have been deliberating about seven hours, and viewing your best recollection to the deliberations, the conversations, discussions, the vote that you had, and the discussion you’re presently having, I want to ask you, Mr. Foreman, whether in your opinion, if there is further deliberation, it is your belief that this jury will be able to arrive at a verdict in these cases. BY THE FOREMAN: Your Honor, I believe we may. THE COURT: You believe you may? BY THE FOREMAN: I believe we may. THE COURT: You may reach a verdict and therefore, I direct that you return to your jury room to further deliberate. I wanted to inquire in view of the time that has transpired, so you go back to your room and deliberate further. Thank you.
The jury retired again at 9:20 P.M., to deliberate, but less than one hour later, at 10:15 P.M., the jurors again returned to the courtroom. The record sets forth further discussion:

THE COURT: Mr. Foreman, I have received a message which causes me to ask you whether it is your belief at this time, the jury will reach a verdict? BY THE FOREMAN: No, Your Honor, I don’t think we will ever reach a verdict. THE COURT: You feel you’ve explored every possibility? BY THE FOREMAN: Yes, Sir. THE COURT: And you feel you’ve had sufficient time? BY THE FOREMAN: Yes, Sir. THE COURT: And you feel the jury will not be able to reach a verdict? BY THE FOREMAN: I have been informed of that, yes, sir. *150 THE COURT: The Court then declares a mistrial of these two cases.
The sole issue for this Court’s determination is whether the lower court erred in its declaration of a mistrial in all of the circumstances of this case. The basic constitutional precept which must guide us is the prohibition against double jeopardy set forth in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which has been held applicable to state trials under the Fourteenth Amendment. Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 89 S. Ct. 2056, 23 L. Ed. 2d 707 (1969). There are no standardized guidelines nor any predetermined periods for juror deliberations prior to the time when a mistrial may be declared, so as to permit the retrial of a criminal defendant. Commonwealth v. Monte, 459 Pa. 495, 329 A.2d 836 (1974); Commonwealth v. Coleman, 235 Pa.Super. 379, 341 A.2d 528 (1975). The length of jury deliberations is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge (Commonwealth v. Campbell, 445 Pa. 488, 284 A.2d 798 (1971)), but any doubts concerning the existence of cause to support the declaration of a mistrial are to be resolved in favor of an accused defendant. Commonwealth v. Howard and Banks, 233 Pa.Super. 496, 335 A.2d 489 (1975). As to cause, really the crucial determination in any case such as this, it has long been established, that the jury should not be discharged in the absence of “manifest necessity” for the trial judge to do so. United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 579, 6 L. Ed. 2d 165 (1824); Commonwealth ex rel. Walton v. Aytch, 466 Pa. 172, 352 A.2d 4 (1976). If such manifest necessity does not exist, double jeopardy attaches and a retrial of the defendant is not permitted.

We have examined the record as a whole in the instant case and have some doubt as to the existence of a manifest necessity for the dismissal of the jury. In these circumstances, we must resolve this doubt in favor of the accused, and hold that a retrial of appellant is barred. Several factors coalesce in producing this conclusion.

The jury in this case was discharged, sua sponte, by the trial judge, at 10:15 P.M. The jurors had begun their *151 considerations just before noon the same day, after five days of trial, and after hearing the testimony of twenty-nine witnesses, arguments by counsel, and extensive instructions by the court. Their deliberations were abbreviated by luncheon and supper breaks, as well as by four separate return visits to the courtroom. On the first such visit, apparently at the request of the trial judge, the foreman, in response to the court’s questioning, stated that no verdict had been reached. The judge gave the jurors a short additional instruction.[1] Only a few minutes later, the jury returned with a request that they be permitted to review the testimony on direct and cross-examination of two witnesses. The trial judge declined to permit such a review and released the jurors for supper. The judge recalled the jurors again at 9:15 P.M., to ask if it was believed that a verdict would be possible. The foreman immediately replied in the affirmative, and the judge released them for further deliberations. The fourth visit by the jury to the courtroom, since beginning deliberations at midday, was fifty-five minutes after it had been announced by the foreman that a verdict could be achieved. However, on this last occasion, the foreman for the first time stated a belief that no verdict could be reached. After asking the foreman a few short questions, the court declared the mistrial. In these circumstances, especially including the complex and conflicting testimony and other evidence to be considered, and the length of the often interrupted jury deliberations, we cannot find that a manifest or absolute[2] necessity existed, at the time for the discharge of the jury. In reaching this conclusion, we find the facts of this case closely analogous to those established in Commonwealth v. Baker, 413 Pa. 105, 196 A.2d 382 (1964), where the Supreme Court reached a similar conclusion. See also United States ex rel. Webb v. Court of *152 Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 516 F.2d 1034 (3rd Cir. 1975).

The dismissal of the jury in this case came less than one hour after the jury foreman expressed the feeling that a verdict could be reached. It also occurred at the first instance at which the court had any indication that the jurors were having difficulty in reaching an agreement. While it was not absolutely necessary to do so, the trial judge made no searching inquiry of each juror.[3] See Commonwealth v. Bartolomocci, 468 Pa. 338, 362 A.2d 234 (1976); Commonwealth v. Coleman, supra; Commonwealth v. Howard and Banks, supra, at footnote 5. Such a practice is preferred. Also, the trial court failed to solicit the views or consent of either the prosecution or the defense prior to the declaration of a mistrial, a procedure which is not mandated, but might have been helpful in resolving doubts about a discharge of the jury. See Commonwealth v. Baker, supra. Under all of these circumstances, and considering the record as a whole, we find an absence of the required absolute or manifest necessity for the discharge of the jury. A retrial, in these events, would violate the appellant’s double jeopardy rights under the Fifth Amendment.

Appellant’s motion to quash indictment is granted, and he is ordered discharged.

PRICE, J., files a dissenting opinion.

JACOBS and WATKINS, former President Judges, and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

*153 PRICE, Judge, dissenting:

The pivotal question is whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in finding manifest necessity to warrant declaring this mistrial. Since I believe that that discretion was properly exercised, I would affirm the denial of the motion to quash in the lower court.

I agree that doubt must be resolved in favor of appellant, however, I would not find a doubt under the circumstances here presented.

The trial judge did not assume a deadlock on the jury. The jury, through the foreman, stated the belief that the jury would never be able to reach a verdict. This was done in open court with all of the jurors present. The trial court had the benefit of the reactions of the jury. None of the jurors offered any contrary view when the foreman informed the court of the deadlock. Commonwealth v. Bartolomucci, 468 Pa. 338, 362 A.2d 234 (1976).

I find no requirement that each juror be questioned. Indeed, the court in Bartolomucci, supra, declined to express a view on such a procedure. And, in keeping with the discretion involved, I note the following excerpt from the trial judge’s remarks at the time the mistrial was declared:

“This has been a difficult case from many angles and in many respects and obviously, you have served very conscientiously, you have given to it your best, and I thank you very much for what you have done. Not every case is resolved by the jury, and you’ve not been able to resolve this one. But it’s written all over your faces that you’ve given it your real consideration, you’ve given it real effort, and I thank you and I congratulate you.” (NT 616) (Emphasis added).
Such a clear indication that the trial judge read the reaction of the jury as agreement with the foreman’s answers, as set forth in the majority opinion, leaves no doubt in my mind that the mistrial was properly declared.

Further, the record reveals no request by appellant to poll the jury, nor does it reveal an objection to the declaration of *154 a mistrial. Under Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418, 326 A.2d 272 (1974), errors not objected to at trial will not be reviewed on appeal. I believe appellant has waived his right to the relief the majority grants.

I would affirm the court below.

NOTES
[1] No issue is raised concerning the propriety of the additional instruction. Commonwealth v. Spencer, 442 Pa. 328, 275 A.2d 299 (1971).

[2] Our Supreme Court has declared that a “manifest necessity” in these circumstances is the equivalent of an “absolute necessity.” Commonwealth v. Baker, 413 Pa. 105, 196 A.2d 382 (1964).

[3] Such an inquiry would have been valuable here, where the jury foreman told the trial judge, when asked if he felt the jury would not be able to reach a verdict: “I have been informed of that, yes, sir.” (Emphasis supplied). Such a response raises questions of whether the foreman’s assessment of irreconcilable conflicts in juror’s attitudes was shared by all of the jurors. See United States ex rel. Webb v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, supra, at 1043-1044, on this issue.

Information Related to Richard Charles Haefner versus Sprague, June 14, 1985.

Haefner v. Sprague
Full Name: Haefner v. Sprague
Citations: 343 Pa. Super. 342, 494 A.2d 1115
Date: June 14, 1985
343 Pa. Superior Ct. 342 (1985).

Richard HAEFNER, Appellant, v. Richard A. SPRAGUE, Edward H. Rubenstone, Sprague and Rubenstone, A Partnership, Jack L. Gruenstein, Michael Minkin, Julie T. Barsel, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 4, 1985, filed June 14, 1985. Gene E.K. Pratter, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before CAVANAUGH, OLSZEWSKI and HOFFMAN, JJ.

CAVANAUGH, Judge: At issue in this pro se appeal by Richard Haefner is whether the trial court properly granted preliminary objections thereby striking appellant’s complaint on the basis that the previous entry of a judgment of non pros for failure to file a complaint on the same cause of action barred the filing of a new complaint.

PREVIOUS HISTORY
Appellant, Richard Haefner, acting pro se, commenced a legal malpractice action by summons against appellee, attorneys, in August of 1983. He was thereafter served with a rule to file a complaint within twenty days. Haefner failed to file a complaint within that period of time, but did file an “Answer” to the rule, stating his desire to conduct discovery in aid of his preparation of a complaint, and seeking time to find an attorney to represent him. Appellees filed a praecipe to enter a judgment of non pros. Thereafter, appellant filed his complaint but, upon preliminary objections, the complaint was stricken. Haefner’s petition to open the judgment of non pros was subsequently denied on May 24, 1984. On appeal to this court, a panel majority affirmed the order of the trial court. Haefner v. Sprague, No. 1873 Philadelphia, 1984 (Pa.Super.Ct. filed April 4, 1985). Meanwhile, Haefner had instituted the *345 present action by summons in April of 1984, followed by a Complaint filed June 5, 1984 an “Amended Complaint” on July 6, 1984, and a “Reinstated Amended Complaint” on July 25, 1984. The present appeal is from the court’s order on preliminary objections dated September 17, 1984 which struck the complaints.

DISCUSSION
The decision of the trial court and appellees’ brief on appeal rely upon a single decision of this court for authority that the new complaint could not be filed. Bon Homme Richard, Etc. v. Three Rivers Bank, 298 Pa.Super. 454, 444 A.2d 1272 (1982). In that case, a panel majority affirmed an order which dismissed a complaint under Allegheny County Local Rule 229(e). The court held that under authority of International Telephone and Telegraph Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 250 Pa.Super. 378, 378 A.2d 986 (1977) the claimant failed to either seek permission to bring a second action or to properly reactivate the complaint which had been dismissed under the local rule. Indeed, in International Telephone, supra, the court adopted an “open judgment” standard for reactivation of complaints which were dismissed for unreasonable inactivity. Thus, in such situations it must be shown that: (1) the petition [for reactivation] is timely filed; (2) the reason for default [inactivity] is reasonably explained; and, (3) facts constituting a meritorious cause of action be alleged. The Bon Homme court found that the appellant there had failed to seek permission to file a second complaint or reactivate the previous complaint and, hence, dismissed the complaint. Indeed, therefore, if Bon Homme, supra, applies to the present action, the dismissal by the court below was proper since Haefner did not successfully seek to reactivate under the International Telephone and Telegraph standard nor did he seek permission to file a second complaint. We find the International Telephone and Telegraph and Bon *346 Homme line of cases,[1] however, to be inapposite. These cases are matters which were dismissed pursuant to local rules of court adopted pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial Administration 1901. That rule, with its stated policy of promoting the prompt conclusion of matters pending in the judicial system, mandated the termination of matters which have “been inactive for an unreasonable period of time. . . .” 1901(a). Each court of common pleas is thus directed to make local rules for the implementation of the policy. As a “minimum standard” Rule 1901 provides that each party be given at least thirty days notice of opportunity for hearing on the proposed termination and if notice is given by publication matters may be reinstated for good cause shown. Accordingly, local rules enacted pursuant to Rule 1901 are intended to reach cases inactive for an unreasonable length of time, and may only be dismissed after reasonable notice. It would follow that reinstatement may be permitted only after meeting an open judgment standard of promptness and merit, otherwise the policy of terminating stale claims as enunciated by Rule 1901 and implemented by local rules would be but an empty fulmination against stale matters pending in the judicial system. Haefner’s first suit was not dismissed under any local rule applicable to inactive cases, however. Granted, it was dismissed for failure to timely file a complaint, but the delay by Haefner is measured in terms of months, not the kind of prolonged inactivity contemplated by Rule 1900;[2] and, true enough, decided cases recognize this distinction.

In very similar circumstances, Gordon-Stuart, Ltd. v. Allen Shops, Inc., 239 Pa.Super. 35, 361 A.2d 770 (1976) a *347 judgment of non pros was entered when plaintiff failed to comply with an order to file a more specific Complaint. More than two months thereafter plaintiff commenced a new action identical to the non prossed suit. This court reversed the trial court order stricking the second complaint. The court noted that plaintiff had tendered the costs incurred in the first action to the defendant and that the statute of limitations had not expired. Following the reasoning of Bucci v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 109 Pa.Super. 167, 167 A. 425 (1933), our court reversed the trial court and held:

In either instance, that is, where the plaintiff is non-prossed for neglecting to file a seasonable complaint, or failing to file an amended pleading, the judgment for the defendant is not on the merits and does not preclude the plaintiff from commencing another suit on the same cause of action, provided that the statute of limitations has not expired and the plaintiff has made payment for the costs of the former suit
Gordon-Stuart Ltd. v. Allen Shops, Inc., 239 Pa.Super. 35, 361 A.2d 770, 772 (1976).

The legal effect of the entry of a judgment of non pros is not such as to preclude a plaintiff who suffers such a judgment from instituting another suit on the same cause of action provided, however, that the second suit is brought within the period of the statute of limitations. Doner v. Jowitt and Rodgers Co., 299 Pa.Super. 492, 445 A.2d 1237 (1982). Accord: Commonwealth v. Bailey, 278 Pa.Super. 51, 419 A.2d 1351 (1980); Kulp v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co., 81 Pa.Super. 296 (1923); Murphy v. Taylor, 63 Pa.Super. 85 (1916); Derrickson v. The Colonial Trust Co., 17 Pa.D. 80 (1907); 7 Standard Pa. Practice 2nd § 39:97.

We find the latter line of cases to control the present situation and further note that there is no contention that Haefner has not offered to pay the costs of the non prossed *348 complaint[3] or that the statute of limitations has expired. Accordingly, the complaint[4] is reinstated and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.

NOTES
[1] See, e.g., Thompson v. Cortese, 41 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 174, 398 A.2d 1079 (1979), Commonwealth Department of Public Welfare v. Flowers, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 326, 407 A.2d 896 (1979); Chaplynsky v. Broad St. Hospital, 305 Pa.Super. 497, 451 A.2d 757 (1982); Faulks v. Papo Bar, Inc., 280 Pa.Super. 454, 421 A.2d 810 (1980).

[2] See, e.q., Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Rule 130 which requires that a case be inactive for two years before being subjected to dismissal. Since most Rule 1901 dismissals for inactivity are ipso facto for cases where the statute of limitations has expired for purposes of a new action, the plaintiff is relegated to seeking reinstatement.

[3] We note that Mr. Haefner was granted in forma pauperis status by order of Judge White on April 26, 1984.

[4] In an apparent effort to cover all contingencies appellant has, in fact, filed a new Complaint, an “Amended Complaint” and a “Reinstated Amended Complaint.” Of course, the trial court may properly cause appellant to justify the multiplicity of actions or face appropriate dismissal.

Cornelia ‘Connie’ June Enright.

Introduction: Cornelia* June Enright was born on December 19, 1950 to Raymond and Alice Enright in Schenectady, NY. Raymond Basil Enright was born on February 20, 1915 in Schenectady, NY, and Alice Shaw was born on June 30, 1918 (also in Schenectady). The couple were married on May 16, 1936 and went on to have three children together: John (b. 1937), Robert (b. 1943), and Cornelia. Mr. Enright was drafted into WWII on April 17, 1943 (he enlisted on October 16, 1940), and in the early part of his marriage was employed at Gloversville Knitting Company. *I did see Connie’s name listed s ‘Constance’ in one source, but that is incorrect.

During her time at Linton High School in Schenectady, Connie majored in Business Education and during her sophomore year was an alternate for the student council, and during her senior year she was an intern for the guidance counselor’s office. A former classmate described her as ‘a ball of energy’ that always made a point of going out of her way to say hello, despite them only being casual acquaintances and having no classes together. Enright graduated in 1968, and a few weeks before she disappeared in April 1969 got a full-time job at the Almart’s Discount Store, which (at the time) was located on Central Avenue in Colonie. At the time she disappeared Connie was nineteen, and she wore her strawberry blonde hair short, had blue eyes, stood at 5’2″ tall and weighed 115 pounds.

April 24, 1969: Raymond and Alice last heard from Cornelia around 9:30 PM on April 24, 1969, when she left with the family car to meet up ‘a girlfriend with whom she worked with’ in nearby Rotterdam for a bite to eat. She arrived at Lum’s Restaurant at 9:30 and according to her friend, the two ate and chatted then eventually went their separate ways in the parking lot; she was last seen driving away from the establishment at 11:00 PM.

The Day After: upon realizing their daughter never returned home the prior evening, the next morning at around 8 AM Cornelia’s father called the Schenectady Police Department and filed a police report. Later that same day the Enright family vehicle was found on State Street near Friendly’s Ice Cream Shop; it was locked, and the keys were missing. Her purse was also nowhere to be found. In the days following Connie’s disappearance, her parents searched her bedroom, top to bottom, but found nothing to be missing. It’s also worth mentioning that the day she disappeared was ‘the day before payday,’ and that she only had around ten to fifteen dollars on her.

Connie’s parents felt their daughter didn’t leave ‘of her own choice,’ and her disappearance was the ‘result of foul play.‘ After very little movement on her case, in 1980 Mr. and Mrs. Enright filed paperwork to have Connie declared ‘legally dead,‘ and said in their petition that in the eleven years since she disappeared, they have unsuccessfully continued searching for her; it went on to say that their efforts included a trip to Newport, Rhode Island after they received a tip that a young woman matching her description was seen at a local store. Unfortunately, the trip was uneventful, but they left some pictures of her behind at the market (just in case). Cornelia’s parents also said she ‘had never run away before’ and that prior to her disappearing they: ‘had no fights or disagreements. To the best of our knowledge, she had no secret boyfriends and none of her friends turned up missing.’

The Enright’s said that from the ‘knowledge of our daughter,’ based on the ‘circumstances surrounding’ her disappearance, that ‘it is our opinion that our daughter is now deceased.’ The petition, which had been prepared by the couples’ attorney Cristine Ciofi of the Schenectady law firm of Higgins, Roberts, Beyerl & Coan, PC Law Firm Profile requested that Connie be declared dead and that her estate (which consisted of personal property with a value not exceeding $400) be settled.

Ray and Alice said Connie was a ‘considerate and thoughtful daughter. If she knew she would be out later than 11 PM she would called home and appraised us of the fact.’ They also said their efforts to find her also included a letter to the Social Security Administration in Baltimore as well as multiple conversations with her co-workers, friends, and acquaintances. They also added ‘we further believe that were she alive today, she would have sent us knowledge of the fact.’ The petition to have Connie declared legally deceased was based on a law which provides that a person who is absent for ‘a continuous period of five years who has not been seen or heard from after diligent search and whose absence is not satisfactory explained, shall he presumed  have died ‘five years after such unexplained absence commenced.’ Their request was approved and Raymond Enright was declared the executive of his daughter’s estate.

Ted Bundy?: at the end of 1968, Ted left Seattle behind and enrolled at Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, and it was also around this time that he was dumped by his first love, Diane Edwards; reports pointed towards him being in a ‘defeated state of mind,’ and that he was lonely and detached. In early 1969, he briefly relocated to the East Coast and slip-flopped between staying at his grandparents’ house in Roxborough and his aunt’s apartment in Lafayette Hill. He was mostly active in his studies at Temple until early March, when (typical Ted)… he stopped going to class after he got into a minor car accident and hurt his ankle.

After Ted found out about being illegitimate, he used some of his ‘leftover money’ (whatever that is) from when he sold his first VW bug in 1968 and went on a trip to New-York City (supposedly he a friend from school had lent him a car). While there he spent his time exploring ‘flesh-shops and accessing the most explicit forms of pornography’ before he returned to Philadelphia (then eventually Washington).

Also around this time Bundy frequented Ocean City, New Jersey, where his grandparents owned a home on 26th Street (he spent a good amount of time there as a child). Where he isn’t officially linked to the murders, he is heavily suspected of being responsible for the murders of Susan Davis and Elizabeth Perry, two coeds from Monticello Women’s Junior College in Godfrey, Illinois that were were brutally stabbed to death on Memorial Day weekend in 1969. Ted would hint in later interviews that he committed his first abduction and murder in Ocean City, in the ‘early summer or spring’ of 1969.

It is worth mentioning that Connie’s car keys were never located, meaning they (most likely) were at some time in the possession of her abductor; Ted’s future girlfriend Liz Kloepfer stated after his first arrest she went snooping around his room at the Rogers Boarding House and she found a bowl full of miscellaneous keys that didn’t belong to him. Cornelia also disappeared at night in a parking lot, which are similar circumstances to many of Bundy’s confirmed victims (Carol DaRonch, Georgann Hawkins, Brenda Ball, Caryn Campbell, Denise Naslund, etc…). Schenectady is also only a few hours away from both Philadelphia and NYC, which puts him fairly near to Connie at the time she disappeared, and we all know Ted had no problem driving hundreds of miles at a time to hunt for his perfect victim. Additionally, we all know that he targeted girls that fit Enright’s physical description, age, personality and socioeconomic background.

Lemuel Warren Smith: one plausible suspect for the abduction of Cornelia Enright is Lemuel Warren Smith, a convicted rapist and serial killer that operated around the general Albany area that is perhaps best known for being the first person in US history to kill an on duty female corrections officer. While serving out his life sentences at the Green Haven Correctional Facility, Smith murdered  thirty-one-year-old Donna Payant; her body was found in a landfill after it was discarded in the prison’s trash.

In April 1969, Smith was a free man living in the Capital District of New York following a 1959 conviction for kidnapping and attempted murder in Baltimore, where he served nearly ten years of a twenty-year sentence before he was paroled in May 1968. He largely stayed in the Albany area during this time until he was rearrested on May 20, 1969 when he kidnapped and sexually assaulted two women in a single day. This time Smith was sentenced to four to fifteen years but was paroled again in October 1976 (shortly before he began the murder spree for which he is best known for). He was caught for the final time on August 19, 1977 after he kidnapped and raped eighteen-year-old Marianne Maggio; thankfully when he forced her to drive towards Albany afterwards, LE stopped their vehicle and took Smith into custody (without incident). As of 2024, Smith remains incarcerated at the Wende Correctional Facility in New York, and where he confessed to his earlier murders, he has consistently maintained his innocence regarding the death of Donna Payant, claiming he was framed by other prison guards’ (a theory that Payant’s own son has called to be reinvestigated).

Robert Garrow: one individual from a Schenectady Facebook group (where I posted asking if anyone remembered Connie) suggested that I look into Robert Garrow, but when I did I got the impression he was more of a pervert and (eventually) spree-killer so I don’t think he would have anything to do with Enright’s disappearance (more importently, he was only active in 1973). In April 1969, Garrow was a free man living in the general Syracuse area and had been released from prison for ‘good behavior’ the previous year after serving only six years of a twenty-year sentence for a 1961 rape conviction. Information regarding his day-to-day activities between 1968 and 1973 is sparse, although it has been confirmed that he worked as a mechanic for a bakery in Syracuse around this time. Investigators have suspected him of being responsible for several cold cases during his five years of freedom, including the 1959 murder of Ruth Whitman, who lived close to him at the time she was killed.

Arthur Shawcross: a name that came up only once in my research is serial killer Arthur John Shawcross, who oddly enough had two separate ‘rounds’ of murders as well as two different types of victims: in 1972 he went away for killing two children under the age of ten in Watertown, NY, and after serving only a fraction of his sentence he was released early on ‘good behavior,’ where he went onto kill eleven sex workers in Rochester. In April 1969, Shawcross was involved in some ‘lower-level’ criminal activity (IE not murder), specifically an arson attack at the Knowlton Brothers Paper Mill. Following this and other incidents involving burglary and arson, he was sentenced to a five-year prison term, of which he served only twenty-two months and he was paroled in October 1971; additionally, some records indicate he was honorably discharged from the US Army around April 1969. I could find no link between him and Cornelia Enright (personally, I don’t think she fit into wither of his demographic of victims).

Frosty Austin: right as I was about to hit the ‘publish’ button, I came across one final piece of information regarding the disappearance of Connie Enright… and at the risk of being dramatic, its something that I find incredibly eerie (I actually sat up in bed and said, ‘oh my gosh, oh my gosh’ a bunch of times until my husband finally asked ‘what?’). There was a unhoused woman in Modesto, CA that (even in her ‘advanced age’) looked incredibly similar to a young Connie, and where I’m not normally someone that puts much effort into ‘solving’ missing persons cases (I will never pretend I know more than law enforcement), this made me actually stop and pay attention.

‘Frosty Austin’ is the alias of an unidentified woman that passed away in a Modesto, California nursing home on October 6, 2018, and despite exhaustive efforts by detectives and the FBI, her true identity remains a mystery. Ms. Austin lived in the Stockton, California area for over thirty years and claimed her maiden name was O’Malley. At the time of her death, she was estimated to be around sixty-seven-years old, 5’6″ tall (Connie waas only 5’2”), and approximately 214 pounds; she had strawberry blonde hair and blue eyes.

Authorities and those that were aquainted with her believe Austin may have been a ‘con-woman’ or fraudster that used multiple assumed identities and told conflicting stories about her past. Her case is listed in the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System as case #UP58456, and ‘armchair detectives’ on social media platforms like Websleuths and Reddit have attempted to link her to multiple missing womens cases (although no match has ever been confirmed).  

Conclusion: Connie’s father Raymond Basil Enright passed away at the age of eighty-two on November 5, 1997, and at the time of his death he had been married to Alice for sixty-one years. According to his obituary, he was born and educated in Schenectady and was employed with General Electric for thirty-seven years: he started his career as an electrician in the main plant and by the time he retired had worked his way up to being a ‘mechanic analyst’ at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory. Mr. Enright was also a member of the GE Quarter Century Club and was part of the flock at the Faith Baptist Church in Schenectady.

Alice June Enright was ninety-four when she entered into eternal rest on January 31, 2013 in Schenectady, NY. According to her obituary, Mrs. Enright was a member of the Faith Baptist Church in Rexford and was a volunteer with their food pantry for many years. She loved seeing movies at the local theater, going out to eat with her loved ones, and gardening; she was also a great cook and enjoyed hosting holidays at her home with her family and friends. Alice looked forward to traveling and visiting with her son Robert that lived in Florida.

Connie’s brother Robert died at the age of eighty-seven on July 26, 2023 in Niceville, FL. Per his obituary, he graduated from Mount Pleasant High School in 1961 and entered the Air Force  shortly after in August 1961, where he served his country for twenty-eight-years as a Weapons Mechanic; he was also involved in the Chemical Warfare unit with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Robert retired as a Senior Master Sergeant and was stationed in several location to include Plattsburgh, NY, Japan, North Carolina, Korea, Thailand (twice) Louisiana, England, Arizona, Virginia, and Florida. He took several classes at Okaloosa-Walton Junior College (which is now Northwest Florida State College) and briefly attended the Senior Non-Commissioned Officer Academy; after he retired from the military, he worked maintenance at the Rocky Bayou Baptist Church for seventeen years, where he also served as a Deacon and was involved in multiple organizations (including Faithful Men, Men’s Retreat Committee, Men’s Breakfast, Benevolence, and Choir). He also loved bowling, running, fishing in his kayak with his buddies, camping, gospel music, and Jesus. John B. Enright died at the age of eighty-six on June 14, 2024 in Schenectady, New York.

As of April 2026, no trace of Cornelia Enright has never been recovered, and in the years following her disappearance, every member of her immediate family has passed away. It could be that for whatever reason, she just decided to up and leave her existing life behind for a new one… but we’ll probably never know the full story.

Works Cited:
charleyproject.org/case/cornelia-june-enright
DeCamilla, Jane. (April 24, 2025). ’56 Years Later, Still No Answers in Disappearance of Schenectady Woman.’ Taken April 20, 2026 from cbs6albany.com
reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/v8qprv/link_between_ted_bundy_cornelia_j_enright_and/
Sommers, Ashleigh. (October 10, 2025). Taken April 20, 2026 from /ashmysteries.com
troopers.ny.gov/missing-enright-cornelia-june Taken on April 20, 2026.
websleuths.com/threads/ny-cornelia-connie-enright-18-rotterdam-24-april-1969.340318/

Connie. Photo courtesy of CBS 6 Albany.
A picture of the Enright family car, which was found locked and abandoned the morning after Connie was last seen alive in a Friendly’s Ice Cream Parking Lot in Schenectady, NY. Photo courtesy of CBS 6 Albany.
A second picture of the Enright family car, this time in the New York snow. Photo courtesy of CBS 6 Albany.
A picture of Connie, courtesy of the Facebook page ‘The 518 Veil,’ and Robert Enright.
A picture of Connie that was taken from The Journal News on May 26, 1967.
Connie’s senior picture from the 1968 Linton High School yearbook.
A missing persons flyer created by the group, ‘Missing People in America.’
Connie Enright’s high school diploma.
A clipping about a Baptist Church in Schenectady that mentions Connie Enright that was published in The Schenectady Gazette on April 1, 1961.
A clipping of a ‘want-ad’ of Connie trying to sell a guitar that was published in The Journal News on May 18, 1965.
An article about vacation bible school that mentions Connie Enright that was published in The Schenectady Gazette on June 21, 1966.
A newspaper article about Cornelia’s nephew’s funeral that was published in The Schenectady Gazette on May 31, 1967.
The only newspaper article about Connie’s disappearance that I could find.
A citation related to the disappearance of Cornelia Enright that was published in The Schenectady Gazette on August 20, 1980.
Connie versus ‘Frosty Austin.’
Some additional information on Frosty Austin.
Ted’s whereabouts in 1969 according to the ‘1992 TB Multiagency Team Report.’
The route from Philadelphia to Schenectady.
The front of Lum’s restaurant in Schenectady, NY.
The black and white picture of Lum’s restaurant in Schenectady, NY.
The parking lot at the Schenectady Friendly’s where the Enright family car was found the morning after Connie was last seen alive.
A comment on a Reddit post about the interstate highway system on a post about Connie made by a user going by the name ‘setthetimer.’
A comment on a Reddit post made by a family member of Connie’s.
A comment on a Reddit post about Connie made by a user going by the name ‘SethPutnamAC.’
A comment on a Reddit post about Connie made by a user going by the name ‘Fast_Cartoonish_132.’
A comment on a Reddit post about Connie made by a user going by the name ‘welcometothecortez.’
A Facebook comment made by a family member of Connie’s.
A Facebook comment made by a Lemont Cranston on a post about Connie Enright.
A Facebook comment from a post about Connie Enright.
A comment on a Websleuth’s post about Connie Enright made my user ‘alynn05.’
A comment made by an acquaintance of Connie’s that went to high school with her.
Ted Bundy’s whereabouts in 1969 per the ‘1992 FBI Bundy Multiagency Team Report.’
A route from Philadelphia to Lum’s Restaurant in Schenectady, NY.
Lemuel Warren Smith.
Robert Garrow.
Arthur Shawcross.
Ray Enright (on the far right) in 1935.
Raymond Enright’s WWII draft card.
Robert Leroy Enright’s birth announcement published in The Schenectady Gazette on April 16, 1943.
Robert Enright from the 1961 Mount Pleasant High School yearbook.
Alice June Enright’s obituary.
Connie’s brother Robert Enright.
Robert Enright’s obituary.
John Enright.

Ted, Liz, and Molly.

I was able to find a few pictures of Ted, Liz, and Molly these past few days and I wanted to share them here. Ted and Liz had a tumultuous relationship that began in September 1969 and eventually fizzled out after his kidnapping conviction in 1976. Both Liz and Molly are alive as of December 2024 and they reside in Seattle, Washington.

A young Elizabeth.
A young Elizabeth Kendall.
Liz at her college graduation from the University of Utah, taken in 1968.
Liz standing in front of her fireplace in her University District apartment.
A picture of Liz taken at he POE, at the University of Washington in Seattle.
Liz at work.
A young Liz.
Liz.
Liz and a young Molly.
Another shot of Liz and Molly taken outside in the sunshine.
Liz and Molly.
A picture of Liz and Molly taken at the Pacific Science enter in Seattle, 1970.
Liz and Molly at Molly’s baptism. Ted was late because the night before he abducted Brenda Ball.
Ted and Molly watching the ‘veg-o-matic man’ at the Washington State Fair in Puyallup, 1970.
Ted and Molly fishing for rainbow trout in Flaming Gorge, UT in 1970.
Molly playing with the hose with Ted in the background; picture taken in July 1970 in Green Lake, Seattle.
Molly and Ted walking out of his parents cabin in Green Lake, Seattle; picture taken in July 1970.
Ted and Molly baking cookies at Green Lake in Seattle, 1970.
Ted swinging Molly around in Flaming Gorge, UT; picture taken in 1970. The Flaming Gorge is a popular recreation area that spans Utah and Wyoming that features a reservoir, dam, and scenic landscape.
Ted and Molly driving a boat.
I couldn’t find another copy of this, I don’t know why Molly’s face is covered up and the other childs isn’t.
Ted and Molly on a carousel at the Seattle Center, 1970.
Ted spraying water on Molly and the neighborhood children.
Ted. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Ted playing with Molly. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Ted. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Another picture of Ted. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Another picture of Ted. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Ted, Molly, and Liz. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Ted and Molly playing by the water. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Ted and Molly playing outside.
Ted teaching Molly how to ride his bike, picture taken in Green Lake in 1970.
Ted teaching Molly how to ride a bike.
Another picture of Ted teaching Molly how to ride a bike.
Ted and Molly at Christmastime in Ogden in 1970.
Another shot of Ted and Molly in Ogden at Christmastime in 1970.
Ted and Molly celebrating Christmas at Green Lake in 1970.
A picture from Molly’s fifth birthday. Ted made the banner. Taken at Green Lake in Seattle, 1971.
Christmas Day in Utah, 1974.
Christmas Day in Utah, 1974.
Ted and Molly around Christmas in 1974. Picture taken at the Hardware Ranch in Utah.
Ted and Molly in their ‘hippie clothes; picture taken in Seattle’s University District in 1975.
Ted swinging Molly around in the University DIstrict in 1975.
Molly putting barrettes in Teds hair during a visit to Seattle. Taken in June 1975 at Liz’s apartment in the University District.
Ted and Molly outside of Liz’s residence in the Universtiy disctict in Seattle, 1975.
Ted and Liz on the lake, about to go waterskiiing, picture taken at Flaming Gorge, UT in 1970. Flaming Gorge is a 91-mile-long reservoir created by damming the Green River in 1958, and is known for its sapphire blue water and is a top destination for boating, fishing, and other water activities.
Ted, Liz, and Molly visiting family in Ogden, UT. Picture taken in 1970.
Ted and Liz at Hood Canal in Washington. Picture taken in 1973.
Ted carrying Liz on his back.
Liz hugging Ted from the back. Does that sweater look familiar? It was the one he wore during his first escape in 1977.
A picture of Ted and Liz; her father is on the other side of her.
Liz and Ted sunbathing.
Ted and Liz.
Ted and Liz in front of a fireplace, picture taken in Ogden, UT in December 1974.
Ted and Liz in Flaming Gorge, Utah in 1975.
Liz laying on Ted’s waterbed in his room at the Rogers Rooming House in Seattle. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Liz, Ted, and Molly on a vacation visiting Liz’s family in Ogden, taken in 1970.
The trio on horses outside of the Liz’s childhood home in Ogden, UT.
Ted tickling Molly, picture taken in December 1974.
Ted and Liz on a trip to the zoo with Molly.
Ted, Liz, and Molly.
Ted and Liz sharing a kiss.
Ted and his little brother Richie on a camping trip.
Ted sitting in front of Liz’s fireplace.
Ted jumping for joy and his first camping trip with Liz; picture taken in 1970 at what would later turn out to be his Issaquah dump site.
Ted playing with his hair.
Ted waking up from a nap at Green Lake in Seattle, 1971.
Ted in 1972.
Ted at Hood Canal, WA in 1973.
A young Ted wearing a suit.
Ted waterskiing.
Ted holding a dog.
A picture of Ted taken in 1972.
Ted taking a nap on Liz’s childhood bed at Christmastime in Utah, 1974.
Ted playing Frisbee on the beach.
An action shot of Ted playing Frisbee on the beach.
Ted in Wyoming on his way to Flaming Gorge, UT.
Ted, smoking. Photo courtesy of ‘Ted Bundy: I was Trying to Think Like an Elk.’
Molly with her biological dad.
A young Molly.
A picture of Molly from high school.
Molly.
Liz Kloepfer.
Liz featured in a news special about Bundy.
Liz after her relationship with Bundy, taken in the 1980’s.
Liz.
Liz.
Liz Kloepfer.
Liz Kloepfer after her relationship with Bundy.
Elizabeth Kloepfer.
Elizabeth Kloepfer.
Liz and Molly in a promotion photo for Amazon’s, ‘Falling for a Killer.’